From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A3C1C54F54 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 16:07:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=1d8NjVYJJn+wjjiK3UWZkRgmZ9sB7Xz8XibGwlAR4TU=; b=EUP4ZznMofxO+kVlQF8F0raSa3 eNqjdt6Qvxo14T2HhoYZJ6tsZ4Pd3Z2MmITqDczV5KhZAxfdf5fAwWVlUuIoyYQAfQoo8in+8mW/F 3giLuN89nvfAVbuDqzWqY8NeigbVUMGk2w4R34ZZ1lYKdW6LLTUfW5YDIfvpSqCYZzIE2470UqgjR XTQML0Wrf13ZK3KU8vtRWu/4Zlc29rMqGwjtNeXqnSHP5SkKak6PSb98Nsr5fhojLHC+QNUfM/11M /3ePo2Uwgz3blpmlfl1sbU0VxyICcAvBO8/cxJPB12XMtWkeK8aFfSGwyMda8F70ZWhRvNbFlY1jv +mPp6m7Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wokLD-00000005mev-1XQL; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 16:07:39 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c0a:e001:78e:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wokLC-00000005men-1amN for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 16:07:38 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07B2143C7B; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 16:07:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BAA8D1F000E9; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 16:07:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1785254857; bh=1d8NjVYJJn+wjjiK3UWZkRgmZ9sB7Xz8XibGwlAR4TU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=do9Qf31f+8z39RaavaLnmBkTzfJzmuRlrk8+c6DfkV589EUCL9anWdb2KW+CMNtWO nrtuVp3Rl2+Ob8SWcEcEgDQDmBmreziaWFdrI6Yya8u6sJo92w2Sj2eF6lkknMnbx5 GswKhL3Abrgsq6uXH23uuN3kfiyB2ZAqwbRqDM15Tnm2MV06pRD43C/kEUuTbiNpZ5 eFujT+vDCoUOvMALJ+z87C7KGHWB/GVtPB7tOshxTpI2jwQtcUuhT1mpVkEPKrdSYm Ssw8TFKkcDDJ/UEBU1loEG+wuv0jrBPxS0Kxb0zv5waA+ONOdsvZbCu6gb2ZomxRa3 OW3+Vdr61M8/w== Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 19:07:30 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport To: Pratyush Yadav Cc: Pasha Tatashin , Alexander Graf , Muchun Song , Oscar Salvador , David Hildenbrand , Andrew Morton , Jason Miu , Jork Loeser , kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/21] kho: make boot time huge page allocation work nicely with KHO Message-ID: References: <20260725172133.4018491-1-pratyush@kernel.org> <2vxzecgn89jt.fsf@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2vxzecgn89jt.fsf@kernel.org> X-BeenThere: kexec@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+kexec=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 04:37:26PM +0200, Pratyush Yadav wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28 2026, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > > Please take a look at Sashiko comments, we might need v5 if it has valid > > (not pre-existing) points. > > I took a quick look and the only valid points I can see are the ones on > patch 19/21 "memblock: make HugeTLB bootmem allocation work with KHO". > > All others are pre-existing problems. > > Is it okay if I send a single follow up patch to fix 19/21? Or would you > prefer a full respin? I prefer a full respin please :) > Also, general thing, but I should go and fix all the pre-existing > problems too at some point. I sent a fix for a really simple one > already, but Sashiko has found other problems too... Yeah, that's true for any subsystem nowadays. > -- > Regards, > Pratyush Yadav -- Sincerely yours, Mike.