From: Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>,
Ben Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc/ppc64/kdump: better flag for running relocatable
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 07:52:31 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b02389c29116c38699a129dfc66be127@bga.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18687.62202.333736.269891@drongo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
On Oct 22, 2008, at 10:43 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Paul Mackerras writes:
>> Milton Miller writes:
>>> Move the flag to 0x5c, 1 word before the secondary cpu entry point at
>>> 0x60. Use the copy at address 0 not the one in the base kernel
>>> image to
>>> make it easier on kexec-tools.
>>
>> Why is it easier on kexec-tools? Doesn't kexec-tools know where it
>> put the kernel?
The archictecture code calls cross-platform code to identify what is
loaded. It isn't specified if this is a shared mmap or a read into
a buffer.
>>
>> I'd much rather keep the flag inside the kdump kernel image, rather
>> than having kexec/kdump start using random fixed locations outside the
>> new kernel image.
>
> In fact the cliching argument is that when the kernel is loaded by OF
> or yaboot, we have no way to tell what will be at location 0x5c,
> whereas we know that the word at offset 0x5c in the kernel image will
> have been initialized to 0. So we had better put the flag inside the
> kernel image.
Well, prom_init will copy the 256 bytes to 0 before the code checks
that location.
However, there is an arguement for using the same code from an epapr
or book-e relocatable, and that would need it at 0. And today
the kexec tool does not do a shared mmap. Since the change has
been made, I will make a new patch for kexec-tools.
milton
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-07 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <f90d4d7306443a720ca31adf513faf25@bga.com>
2008-10-22 20:39 ` [PATCH 3/3] powerpc/ppc64/kdump: better flag for running relocatable Milton Miller
2008-10-23 3:23 ` Michael Neuling
2008-10-23 3:32 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-10-23 3:43 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-10-24 4:41 ` Michael Neuling
2008-11-07 13:52 ` Milton Miller [this message]
2008-10-23 15:15 ` Mohan Kumar M
2008-11-07 13:59 ` Milton Miller
2008-11-10 15:22 ` Mohan Kumar M
2008-11-11 16:06 ` Milton Miller
2008-10-22 20:39 ` [PATCH 1/2 kexec-tools] ppc64: new relocatble kernel activation ABI Milton Miller
2008-10-22 20:39 ` [PATCH 2/2 kexec-tools] ppc64: segemments are sorted Milton Miller
2008-10-22 20:47 ` Milton Miller
2008-10-22 20:39 ` [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: kexec exit should not use magic numbers Milton Miller
2008-10-22 23:18 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b02389c29116c38699a129dfc66be127@bga.com \
--to=miltonm@bga.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox