From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0767ECA0EC4 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2025 01:53:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=2c032Id+us2/r7GPFiIYUJLtTgBzUuAgV2dnYC0BzxE=; b=AZ7Dq5cTZ/HjypFwkkIZtR5lYF KlpFfG9GJweP9A7yhoLXOnQ7Uuz+vmArVJKD3SDD7lYrN6yjWUi+raOKnjttfOfs46gekeZOp99XH lZjNbSthpfmfi3+1ET2FzFAvEtFQi7xO7l/qKm0xlXtiLDwVrwwjMkwL0De5qzTt6S/i5MxYzPal/ shmpRhnHSNKfCD+POrl5C7aKRGGwk64BzlaAudfn/NthSVnAwgXMroGpgTMJsah8gApMKcqKbgP+F HMiMH31UwJSdDAA65+Z0M6KKLGR41znFMszxwUsgZZLb9SUlEOryFm/JmSzJ40XrfRUJEb74kSIPJ Pv0JuWhA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uleCx-00000009YX3-145c; Tue, 12 Aug 2025 01:53:47 +0000 Received: from out-173.mta1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:203:375::ad]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uleCt-00000009YWG-1MzX for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2025 01:53:45 +0000 Message-ID: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1754963619; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2c032Id+us2/r7GPFiIYUJLtTgBzUuAgV2dnYC0BzxE=; b=oiGOUVpewvUtSZVNlkuRkXSjS63LTLt6x4fx0fPVjsLHngTIkT/h3YYUxcyEFbaD95Gvmz Dn2JNV8UOS1qXtN0kHqeOKwijiM5GrJIKGp/acHJaJDlHx9O25nIG1N8024Qx9UeCjTxbS h3VziNt67gwY4l3DS2B1Hr1eoIAFvSw= Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 09:53:25 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] LoongArch: Add kexec_file support To: Youling Tang , Huacai Chen Cc: WANG Xuerui , Baoquan He , kexec@lists.infradead.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Youling Tang References: <20250811092659.14903-1-youling.tang@linux.dev> <20250811092659.14903-3-youling.tang@linux.dev> <9760e574-3eb0-46b2-bccd-916f73b9c39e@linux.dev> Content-Language: en-US X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Yanteng Si In-Reply-To: <9760e574-3eb0-46b2-bccd-916f73b9c39e@linux.dev> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250811_185343_797965_3964C81E X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.31 ) X-BeenThere: kexec@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+kexec=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org 在 8/12/25 9:21 AM, Youling Tang 写道: > Hi, Huacai > On 2025/8/11 22:07, Huacai Chen wrote: >> Hi, Youling, >> >> On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 5:28 PM Youling Tang wrote: >>> From: Youling Tang >>> >>> This patch adds support for kexec_file on LoongArch. >>> >>> The image_load() as two parts: >>> - the first part loads the kernel image (vmlinuz.efi or vmlinux.efi) >>> - the second part loads other segments (eg: initrd, cmdline) >>> >>> Currently, pez(vmlinuz.efi) and pei(vmlinux.efi) format images are supported, >>> but ELF format is not supported. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Youling Tang >>> --- >>>   arch/loongarch/Kconfig                     |   8 ++ >>>   arch/loongarch/include/asm/image.h         |  18 ++++ >>>   arch/loongarch/include/asm/kexec.h         |  12 +++ >>>   arch/loongarch/kernel/Makefile             |   1 + >>>   arch/loongarch/kernel/kexec_image.c        | 112 +++++++++++++++++++++ >>>   arch/loongarch/kernel/machine_kexec.c      |  33 ++++-- >>>   arch/loongarch/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c |  46 +++++++++ >>>   7 files changed, 219 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) >>>   create mode 100644 arch/loongarch/kernel/kexec_image.c >>>   create mode 100644 arch/loongarch/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/Kconfig b/arch/loongarch/Kconfig >>> index f0abc38c40ac..fd50c83f7827 100644 >>> --- a/arch/loongarch/Kconfig >>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/Kconfig >>> @@ -625,6 +625,14 @@ config CPU_HAS_PREFETCH >>>   config ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC >>>          def_bool y >>> >>> +config ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_FILE >>> +       def_bool 64BIT >>> + >>> +config ARCH_SELECTS_KEXEC_FILE >>> +       def_bool y >>> +       depends on KEXEC_FILE >>> +       select HAVE_IMA_KEXEC if IMA >>> + >>>   config ARCH_SUPPORTS_CRASH_DUMP >>>          def_bool y >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/image.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/image.h >>> index 1f090736e71d..829e1ecb1f5d 100644 >>> --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/image.h >>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/image.h >>> @@ -36,5 +36,23 @@ struct loongarch_image_header { >>>          uint32_t pe_header; >>>   }; >>> >>> +static const uint8_t loongarch_image_pe_sig[2] = {'M', 'Z'}; >>> +static const uint8_t loongarch_pe_machtype[6] = {'P', 'E', 0x0, 0x0, 0x64, 0x62}; >>> + >>> +/** >>> + * loongarch_header_check_pe_sig - Helper to check the loongarch image header. >>> + * >>> + * Returns non-zero if 'MZ' signature is found. >>> + */ >>> + >>> +static inline int loongarch_header_check_pe_sig(const struct loongarch_image_header *h) >>> +{ >>> +       if (!h) >>> +               return 0; >>> + >>> +       return (h->pe_sig[0] == loongarch_image_pe_sig[0] >>> +               && h->pe_sig[1] == loongarch_image_pe_sig[1]); >>> +} >>> + >>>   #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ >>>   #endif /* __ASM_IMAGE_H */ >>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kexec.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kexec.h >>> index cf95cd3eb2de..3ef8517a3670 100644 >>> --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kexec.h >>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kexec.h >>> @@ -41,6 +41,18 @@ struct kimage_arch { >>>          unsigned long systable_ptr; >>>   }; >>> >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE >>> +extern const struct kexec_file_ops kexec_image_ops; >>> + >>> +int arch_kimage_file_post_load_cleanup(struct kimage *image); >>> +#define arch_kimage_file_post_load_cleanup arch_kimage_file_post_load_cleanup >>> + >>> +extern int load_other_segments(struct kimage *image, >>> +               unsigned long kernel_load_addr, unsigned long kernel_size, >>> +               char *initrd, unsigned long initrd_len, >>> +               char *cmdline, unsigned long cmdline_len); >> I think the RISC-V naming "load_extra_segments" is better. > This name is also fine, but I prefer it to be consistent with > that in kexec-tools. I have looked at the code of kexec-tools, and it seems that you referenced a great deal of ARM code when implementing the LoongArch part. >> >>> +#endif >>> + >>>   typedef void (*do_kexec_t)(unsigned long efi_boot, >>>                             unsigned long cmdline_ptr, >>>                             unsigned long systable_ptr, >>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/Makefile b/arch/loongarch/kernel/Makefile >>> index 6f5a4574a911..bd9405ee3888 100644 >>> --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/Makefile >>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/Makefile >>> @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ)     += sysrq.o >>>   obj-$(CONFIG_RELOCATABLE)      += relocate.o >>> >>>   obj-$(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE)       += machine_kexec.o relocate_kernel.o >>> +obj-$(CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE)       += machine_kexec_file.o kexec_image.o >> We only support the efi format, so we don't need to split a >> kexec_image.c like RISC-V, just put everything into >> machine_kexec_file.c is OK. > I hope it is separated and consistent with other architectures. > For instance, arm64 only supports one type. The ARM64 architecture has a long history, and we shouldn't be constrained by it. Thanks, Yanteng > > Youling. >> >> Huacai