Kexec Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric DeVolder <eric.devolder@oracle.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	vschneid@redhat.com, dyoung@redhat.com,
	sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Crash: add lock to serialize crash hotplug handling
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 09:59:13 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d6bd8083-94e5-9bb3-7b1e-5bf6cc954baa@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230925030701.338672-1-bhe@redhat.com>



On 9/24/23 22:07, Baoquan He wrote:
> Eric reported that handling corresponding crash hotplug event can be
> failed easily when many memory hotplug event are notified in a short
> period. They failed because failing to take __kexec_lock.
> 
> =======
> [   78.714569] Fallback order for Node 0: 0
> [   78.714575] Built 1 zonelists, mobility grouping on.  Total pages: 1817886
> [   78.717133] Policy zone: Normal
> [   78.724423] crash hp: kexec_trylock() failed, elfcorehdr may be inaccurate
> [   78.727207] crash hp: kexec_trylock() failed, elfcorehdr may be inaccurate
> [   80.056643] PEFILE: Unsigned PE binary
> =======
> 
> The memory hotplug events are notified very quickly and very many,
> while the handling of crash hotplug is much slower relatively. So the
> atomic variable __kexec_lock and kexec_trylock() can't guarantee the
> serialization of crash hotplug handling.
> 
> Here, add a new mutex lock __crash_hotplug_lock to serialize crash
> hotplug handling specifically. This doesn't impact the usage of
> __kexec_lock.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> ---
> v1->v2:
>   - Move mutex lock definition into CONFIG_CRASH_HOTPLUG ifdeffery
>     scope in kernel/crash_core.c because the lock is only needed and
>     used in that scope. Suggested by Eric.
> 
>   kernel/crash_core.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/crash_core.c b/kernel/crash_core.c
> index 03a7932cde0a..5951d6366b72 100644
> --- a/kernel/crash_core.c
> +++ b/kernel/crash_core.c
> @@ -739,6 +739,17 @@ subsys_initcall(crash_notes_memory_init);
>   #undef pr_fmt
>   #define pr_fmt(fmt) "crash hp: " fmt
>   
> +/*
> + * Different than kexec/kdump loading/unloading/jumping/shrinking which
> + * usually rarely happen, there will be many crash hotplug events notified
> + * during one short period, e.g one memory board is hot added and memory
> + * regions are online. So mutex lock  __crash_hotplug_lock is used to
> + * serialize the crash hotplug handling specifically.
> + */
> +DEFINE_MUTEX(__crash_hotplug_lock);
> +#define crash_hotplug_lock() mutex_lock(&__crash_hotplug_lock)
> +#define crash_hotplug_unlock() mutex_unlock(&__crash_hotplug_lock)
> +
>   /*
>    * This routine utilized when the crash_hotplug sysfs node is read.
>    * It reflects the kernel's ability/permission to update the crash
> @@ -783,9 +794,11 @@ static void crash_handle_hotplug_event(unsigned int hp_action, unsigned int cpu)
>   {
>   	struct kimage *image;
>   
> +	crash_hotplug_lock();
>   	/* Obtain lock while changing crash information */
>   	if (!kexec_trylock()) {
>   		pr_info("kexec_trylock() failed, elfcorehdr may be inaccurate\n");
> +		crash_hotplug_unlock();
>   		return;
>   	}
>   
> @@ -852,6 +865,7 @@ static void crash_handle_hotplug_event(unsigned int hp_action, unsigned int cpu)
>   out:
>   	/* Release lock now that update complete */
>   	kexec_unlock();
> +	crash_hotplug_unlock();
>   }
>   
>   static int crash_memhp_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val, void *v)

The crash_check_update_elfcorehdr() also has kexec_trylock() and needs similar treatment.
Userspace (ie udev rule processing) and kernel (crash hotplug infrastrucutre) need to be
protected/serialized from one another.

Eric

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-25 14:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-25  3:07 [PATCH v2] Crash: add lock to serialize crash hotplug handling Baoquan He
2023-09-25 14:59 ` Eric DeVolder [this message]
2023-09-26 12:03   ` Baoquan He

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d6bd8083-94e5-9bb3-7b1e-5bf6cc954baa@oracle.com \
    --to=eric.devolder@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox