From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: <arjan@linux.intel.com>, <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
<ashok.raj@linux.intel.com>, <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
<thomas.lendacky@amd.com>, <tony.luck@intel.com>,
<tonyb@cybernetics.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
<kexec@lists.infradead.org>, Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG REPORT] Triggering a panic in an x86 virtual machine does not wait
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2023 14:44:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d7f266fd-e34d-e26e-e371-ee6ff13b6696@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ttui91jo.ffs@tglx>
On 2023/7/5 16:59, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03 2023 at 11:44, Baokun Li wrote:
>
>> When I manually trigger panic in a qume x86 VM with
>>
>> `echo c > /proc/sysrq-trigger`,
>>
>> I find that the VM will probably reboot directly, but the
>> PANIC_TIMEOUT is 0.
>> This prevents us from exporting the vmcore via panic, and even if we succeed
>> in panic exporting the vmcore, the processes in the vmcore are mostly
>> stop_this_cpu(). By dichotomizing we found the patch that introduced the
>> behavior change
>>
>> 45e34c8af58f ("x86/smp: Put CPUs into INIT on shutdown if possible"),
> Bah, I missed that this is used by crash too. So if this happens to be
> invoked on an AP, i.e. not on CPU 0, then the INIT will reset the
> machine. Fix below.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> index ed2d51960a7d..e1aa2cd7734b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> @@ -1348,6 +1348,14 @@ bool smp_park_other_cpus_in_init(void)
> if (apic->wakeup_secondary_cpu_64 || apic->wakeup_secondary_cpu)
> return false;
>
> + /*
> + * If this is a crash stop which does not execute on the boot CPU,
> + * then this cannot use the INIT mechanism because INIT to the boot
> + * CPU will reset the machine.
> + */
> + if (this_cpu)
> + return false;
> +
> for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
> if (cpu == this_cpu)
> continue;
This patch does fix the problem of rebooting at panic, but the exported
stack
stays at stop_this_cpu() like below, instead of showing what the
corresponding
process is doing as before.
PID: 681 TASK: ffff9ac2429d3080 CPU: 2 COMMAND: "fsstress"
#0 [ffffb00200184fd0] stop_this_cpu at ffffffff89a4ffd8
#1 [ffffb00200184fe8] __sysvec_reboot at ffffffff89a94213
#2 [ffffb00200184ff0] sysvec_reboot at ffffffff8aee7491
--- <IRQ stack> ---
RIP: 0000000000000010 RSP: 0000000000000018 RFLAGS: ffffb00200f8bd08
RAX: ffff9ac256fda9d8 RBX: 0000000009973a85 RCX: ffff9ac256fda078
RDX: ffff9ac24416e300 RSI: ffff9ac256fda9e0 RDI: ffffffffffffffff
RBP: ffff9ac2443a5f88 R8: 0000000000000000 R9: ffff9ac2422eeea0
R10: ffff9ac256fda9d8 R11: 0000000000549921 R12: ffff9ac2422eeea0
R13: ffff9ac251cd23c8 R14: ffff9ac24269a800 R15: ffff9ac251cd2150
ORIG_RAX: ffffffff8a1719e4 CS: 0206 SS: ffffffff8a1719c8
bt: WARNING: possibly bogus exception frame
Do you know how this happened? I would be grateful if you could fix it.
Thanks!
--
With Best Regards,
Baokun Li
.
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-06 6:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20230615193330.608657211@linutronix.de>
[not found] ` <71578392-63ed-02a9-24da-2adf8cce38c7@huawei.com>
2023-07-05 8:59 ` [BUG REPORT] Triggering a panic in an x86 virtual machine does not wait Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-06 6:44 ` Baokun Li [this message]
2023-07-07 10:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-07 12:40 ` Baokun Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d7f266fd-e34d-e26e-e371-ee6ff13b6696@huawei.com \
--to=libaokun1@huawei.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=tonyb@cybernetics.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox