Kexec Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "chenjiahao (C)" <chenjiahao16@huawei.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	<kexec@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>, <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	<conor.dooley@microchip.com>, <guoren@kernel.org>,
	<heiko@sntech.de>, <bjorn@rivosinc.com>, <alex@ghiti.fr>,
	<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <atishp@rivosinc.com>,
	<bhe@redhat.com>, <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>,
	<horms@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v4 0/2] support allocating crashkernel above 4G explicitly on riscv
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 21:20:53 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <db4ba964-1c09-1d8a-bfc4-8fe50debfc6c@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230410130553.3226347-1-chenjiahao16@huawei.com>


On 2023/4/10 21:05, Chen Jiahao wrote:
> On riscv, the current crash kernel allocation logic is trying to
> allocate within 32bit addressible memory region by default, if
> failed, try to allocate without 4G restriction.
>
> In need of saving DMA zone memory while allocating a relatively large
> crash kernel region, allocating the reserved memory top down in
> high memory, without overlapping the DMA zone, is a mature solution.
> Hence this patchset introduces the parameter option crashkernel=X,[high,low].
>
> One can reserve the crash kernel from high memory above DMA zone range
> by explicitly passing "crashkernel=X,high"; or reserve a memory range
> below 4G with "crashkernel=X,low". Besides, there are few rules need
> to take notice:
> 1. "crashkernel=X,[high,low]" will be ignored if "crashkernel=size"
>     is specified.
> 2. "crashkernel=X,low" is valid only when "crashkernel=X,high" is passed
>     and there is enough memory to be allocated under 4G.
> 3. When allocating crashkernel above 4G and no "crashkernel=X,low" is
>     specified, a 128M low memory will be allocated automatically for
>     swiotlb bounce buffer.
> See Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt for more information.
>
> To verify loading the crashkernel, adapted kexec-tools is attached below:
> https://github.com/chenjh005/kexec-tools/tree/build-test-riscv-v2
>
> Following test cases have been performed as expected:
> 1) crashkernel=256M                          //low=256M
> 2) crashkernel=1G                            //low=1G
> 3) crashkernel=4G                            //high=4G, low=128M(default)
> 4) crashkernel=4G crashkernel=256M,high      //high=4G, low=128M(default), high is ignored
> 5) crashkernel=4G crashkernel=256M,low       //high=4G, low=128M(default), low is ignored
> 6) crashkernel=4G,high                       //high=4G, low=128M(default)
> 7) crashkernel=256M,low                      //low=0M, invalid
> 8) crashkernel=4G,high crashkernel=256M,low  //high=4G, low=256M
> 9) crashkernel=4G,high crashkernel=4G,low    //high=0M, low=0M, invalid
> 10) crashkernel=512M@0xd0000000              //low=512M
> 11) crashkernel=1G@0xe0000000                //high=0M, low=0M, no enough low memory, failed
>
> Changes since [v4]:
> 1. Update some imprecise code comments for cmdline parsing.
>
> Changes since [v3]:
> 1. Update to print warning and return explicitly on failure when
>     crashkernel=size@offset is specified. Not changing the result
>     in this case but making the logic more straightforward.
> 2. Some minor cleanup.
>
> Changes since [v2]:
> 1. Update the allocation logic to ensure the high crashkernel
>     region is reserved strictly above dma32_phys_limit.
> 2. Clean up some minor format problems.
>
> Chen Jiahao (2):
>    riscv: kdump: Implement crashkernel=X,[high,low]
>    docs: kdump: Update the crashkernel description for riscv
>
>   .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         | 15 ++--
>   arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c                     |  5 ++
>   arch/riscv/mm/init.c                          | 71 +++++++++++++++++--
>   3 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Hi folks,

The current version has fix all problems up-to-date, please let me know
if there is any other bug, or somewhere not quiet correct. Thanks for
looking into this.

Best Regards,
Jiahao


_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-25 13:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-10 13:05 [PATCH -next v4 0/2] support allocating crashkernel above 4G explicitly on riscv Chen Jiahao
2023-04-10 13:05 ` [PATCH -next v4 1/2] riscv: kdump: Implement crashkernel=X,[high,low] Chen Jiahao
2023-04-11  7:35   ` Simon Horman
2023-04-27  2:13   ` Baoquan He
2023-05-11  8:47     ` chenjiahao (C)
2023-05-20 13:19       ` Baoquan He
2023-04-10 13:05 ` [PATCH -next v4 2/2] docs: kdump: Update the crashkernel description for riscv Chen Jiahao
2023-04-25 13:20 ` chenjiahao (C) [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=db4ba964-1c09-1d8a-bfc4-8fe50debfc6c@huawei.com \
    --to=chenjiahao16@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
    --cc=atishp@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=bjorn@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
    --cc=guoren@kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox