From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B472DCA0EE0 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2025 14:52:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=UB0EMZuXYKOyyxldrdbQ63aHyFJ+9vuYs0ibMI6aTWo=; b=Piv9mXhBK/94t4ohQvNZQFTOus Xnvnly3dNa4PUffuztusLLyVx6jRkKEVyQDWqk6yOxxkjMawqYLsRcexKXimHoOonlWt9djgLJtg+ WNLJRcG7iv8/0adKB8K+dQ9t56Xsthd56h+9QrkAUy+eN8YnSMoVNdFe0LH+QiTqr3anStlkTLBK5 gFn0Aim1wXNs42bpY1FU/K5SiUzFPEeMzq7Vs35VUx0Q/yDiCw/K7gcQCk4yXm7HF+xcZkJsw5OeJ 8eM6udrPHOcItti+4RkpN1BE/C9dcdS8zbVjtnvZmn7t7prz2EQBqcUAHOTbHuVFgwT20MRGPmFdy Gga1iNbQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ulqMr-0000000B72t-0VgB; Tue, 12 Aug 2025 14:52:49 +0000 Received: from out-171.mta1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:203:375::ab]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ullPJ-0000000AOS1-38zH for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2025 09:35:03 +0000 Message-ID: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1754991175; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UB0EMZuXYKOyyxldrdbQ63aHyFJ+9vuYs0ibMI6aTWo=; b=E/7GW/RORpntKNSzjue4zCvcXnS3P+iV9m+YlyMAyxJYVmthvQH5CSENyWcj+IciXmG/d8 Fl2CnYA7F7MrOurBihPqvmoUaPJbWhXzUKEDAoRKFDxHOAP8piIvc5AHVNfPuQlEQPHA7G 9ZfTya60lIenlfgcBWsgcrnQzAHsqlo= Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 17:32:15 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] LoongArch: Add kexec_file support To: Yanteng Si , Huacai Chen Cc: WANG Xuerui , Baoquan He , kexec@lists.infradead.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Youling Tang References: <20250811092659.14903-1-youling.tang@linux.dev> <20250811092659.14903-3-youling.tang@linux.dev> <9760e574-3eb0-46b2-bccd-916f73b9c39e@linux.dev> Content-Language: en-US X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Youling Tang In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250812_023501_934291_9862CEC0 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.34 ) X-BeenThere: kexec@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+kexec=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi, Yanteng On 2025/8/12 09:53, Yanteng Si wrote: > 在 8/12/25 9:21 AM, Youling Tang 写道: >> Hi, Huacai >> On 2025/8/11 22:07, Huacai Chen wrote: >>> Hi, Youling, >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 5:28 PM Youling Tang >>> wrote: >>>> From: Youling Tang >>>> >>>> This patch adds support for kexec_file on LoongArch. >>>> >>>> The image_load() as two parts: >>>> - the first part loads the kernel image (vmlinuz.efi or vmlinux.efi) >>>> - the second part loads other segments (eg: initrd, cmdline) >>>> >>>> Currently, pez(vmlinuz.efi) and pei(vmlinux.efi) format images are >>>> supported, >>>> but ELF format is not supported. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Youling Tang >>>> --- >>>>   arch/loongarch/Kconfig                     |   8 ++ >>>>   arch/loongarch/include/asm/image.h         |  18 ++++ >>>>   arch/loongarch/include/asm/kexec.h         |  12 +++ >>>>   arch/loongarch/kernel/Makefile             |   1 + >>>>   arch/loongarch/kernel/kexec_image.c        | 112 >>>> +++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>   arch/loongarch/kernel/machine_kexec.c      |  33 ++++-- >>>>   arch/loongarch/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c |  46 +++++++++ >>>>   7 files changed, 219 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) >>>>   create mode 100644 arch/loongarch/kernel/kexec_image.c >>>>   create mode 100644 arch/loongarch/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c >>>> >>>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/Kconfig b/arch/loongarch/Kconfig >>>> index f0abc38c40ac..fd50c83f7827 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/loongarch/Kconfig >>>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/Kconfig >>>> @@ -625,6 +625,14 @@ config CPU_HAS_PREFETCH >>>>   config ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC >>>>          def_bool y >>>> >>>> +config ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_FILE >>>> +       def_bool 64BIT >>>> + >>>> +config ARCH_SELECTS_KEXEC_FILE >>>> +       def_bool y >>>> +       depends on KEXEC_FILE >>>> +       select HAVE_IMA_KEXEC if IMA >>>> + >>>>   config ARCH_SUPPORTS_CRASH_DUMP >>>>          def_bool y >>>> >>>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/image.h >>>> b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/image.h >>>> index 1f090736e71d..829e1ecb1f5d 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/image.h >>>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/image.h >>>> @@ -36,5 +36,23 @@ struct loongarch_image_header { >>>>          uint32_t pe_header; >>>>   }; >>>> >>>> +static const uint8_t loongarch_image_pe_sig[2] = {'M', 'Z'}; >>>> +static const uint8_t loongarch_pe_machtype[6] = {'P', 'E', 0x0, >>>> 0x0, 0x64, 0x62}; >>>> + >>>> +/** >>>> + * loongarch_header_check_pe_sig - Helper to check the loongarch >>>> image header. >>>> + * >>>> + * Returns non-zero if 'MZ' signature is found. >>>> + */ >>>> + >>>> +static inline int loongarch_header_check_pe_sig(const struct >>>> loongarch_image_header *h) >>>> +{ >>>> +       if (!h) >>>> +               return 0; >>>> + >>>> +       return (h->pe_sig[0] == loongarch_image_pe_sig[0] >>>> +               && h->pe_sig[1] == loongarch_image_pe_sig[1]); >>>> +} >>>> + >>>>   #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ >>>>   #endif /* __ASM_IMAGE_H */ >>>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kexec.h >>>> b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kexec.h >>>> index cf95cd3eb2de..3ef8517a3670 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kexec.h >>>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kexec.h >>>> @@ -41,6 +41,18 @@ struct kimage_arch { >>>>          unsigned long systable_ptr; >>>>   }; >>>> >>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE >>>> +extern const struct kexec_file_ops kexec_image_ops; >>>> + >>>> +int arch_kimage_file_post_load_cleanup(struct kimage *image); >>>> +#define arch_kimage_file_post_load_cleanup >>>> arch_kimage_file_post_load_cleanup >>>> + >>>> +extern int load_other_segments(struct kimage *image, >>>> +               unsigned long kernel_load_addr, unsigned long >>>> kernel_size, >>>> +               char *initrd, unsigned long initrd_len, >>>> +               char *cmdline, unsigned long cmdline_len); >>> I think the RISC-V naming "load_extra_segments" is better. >> This name is also fine, but I prefer it to be consistent with >> that in kexec-tools. > I have looked at the code of kexec-tools, and it seems that you > referenced a great deal of ARM code when implementing the LoongArch part. > > >>> >>>> +#endif >>>> + >>>>   typedef void (*do_kexec_t)(unsigned long efi_boot, >>>>                             unsigned long cmdline_ptr, >>>>                             unsigned long systable_ptr, >>>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/Makefile >>>> b/arch/loongarch/kernel/Makefile >>>> index 6f5a4574a911..bd9405ee3888 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/Makefile >>>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/Makefile >>>> @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ)     += sysrq.o >>>>   obj-$(CONFIG_RELOCATABLE)      += relocate.o >>>> >>>>   obj-$(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE)       += machine_kexec.o relocate_kernel.o >>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE)       += machine_kexec_file.o kexec_image.o >>> We only support the efi format, so we don't need to split a >>> kexec_image.c like RISC-V, just put everything into >>> machine_kexec_file.c is OK. >> I hope it is separated and consistent with other architectures. >> For instance, arm64 only supports one type. > The ARM64 architecture has a long history, and we shouldn't be > constrained by it. Support for kexec_elf.c in ELF format may be considered for addition in the future. Thanks, Youling. > > > Thanks, > Yanteng >> >> Youling. >>> >>> Huacai