From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>,
noodles@fb.com, bauermann@kolabnow.com,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Cc: code@tyhicks.com, nramas@linux.microsoft.com, paul@paul-moore.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] ima: allocate buffer at kexec load to hold ima measurements
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2023 09:01:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ef2f8f1f9ab806e010cac02aab1b64fa51ce4c2c.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230703215709.1195644-4-tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>
Hi Tushar,
The function to "ima: allocate buffer at kexec load to hold ima
measurements" already exists. Please update the Subject line to
indicate increasing the IMA kexec buffer size.
On Mon, 2023-07-03 at 14:57 -0700, Tushar Sugandhi wrote:
> The IMA subsystem needs a dedicated mechanism to reserve extra memory for
> measurements added between the kexec 'load' and kexec 'execute'.
What is a "dedicated mechanism?". Either start the sentence with
"reserve ..." or completely remove it.
> Update ima_add_kexec_buffer to allocate a buffer of a sufficient size
> taking ima binary runtime measurements size, size of ima_kexec_hdr, and
> IMA_KEXEC_EXTRA_SIZE into account. Adjust the kexec_segment_size to align
> to the PAGE_SIZE. Call ima_allocate_buf_at_kexec_load() to allocate the
> buffer.
The size of the ima_kexec_hdr kind of gets lost in the amount of
additional memory being allocated, but sure it's a nice clean up.
> This patch assumes the extra space defined (IMA_KEXEC_EXTRA_SIZE) is
> sufficient to handle the additional measurements. This should be as per
> the system requirements and based on the number of additional measurements
> expected during the window from kexec 'load' to kexec 'execute'.
Should the extra amount of memory be hard coded?
> Signed-off-by: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>
> ---
> security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 2 ++
> security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c | 21 ++++++++++-----------
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
> index c29db699c996..2ffda9449b9b 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
> @@ -43,6 +43,8 @@ enum tpm_pcrs { TPM_PCR0 = 0, TPM_PCR8 = 8, TPM_PCR10 = 10 };
>
> #define NR_BANKS(chip) ((chip != NULL) ? chip->nr_allocated_banks : 0)
>
> +#define IMA_KEXEC_EXTRA_SIZE (16 * PAGE_SIZE)
>
Not all IMA policies require extra memory. Define and use a new IMA
Kconfig to set the amount of extra memory.
> /* current content of the policy */
> extern int ima_policy_flag;
>
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
> index 858b67689701..7deb8df31485 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
> @@ -188,31 +188,30 @@ void ima_add_kexec_buffer(struct kimage *image)
> /* use more understandable variable names than defined in kbuf */
> void *kexec_buffer = NULL;
> size_t kexec_buffer_size;
> - size_t kexec_segment_size;
> int ret;
>
> /*
> - * Reserve an extra half page of memory for additional measurements
> - * added during the kexec load.
> + * Reserve extra memory for measurements added in the window from
> + * kexec 'load' to kexec 'execute'.
> */
> - binary_runtime_size = ima_get_binary_runtime_size();
> + binary_runtime_size = ima_get_binary_runtime_size() +
> + sizeof(struct ima_kexec_hdr) +
> + IMA_KEXEC_EXTRA_SIZE;
> +
> if (binary_runtime_size >= ULONG_MAX - PAGE_SIZE)
> kexec_segment_size = ULONG_MAX;
> else
> - kexec_segment_size = ALIGN(ima_get_binary_runtime_size() +
> - PAGE_SIZE / 2, PAGE_SIZE);
> + kexec_segment_size = ALIGN(binary_runtime_size, PAGE_SIZE);
> +
> if ((kexec_segment_size == ULONG_MAX) ||
> ((kexec_segment_size >> PAGE_SHIFT) > totalram_pages() / 2)) {
> pr_err("Binary measurement list too large.\n");
> return;
> }
>
> - ima_dump_measurement_list(&kexec_buffer_size, &kexec_buffer,
> - kexec_segment_size);
Removing the call to ima_dump_measurement_list here is not bisect safe.
> - if (!kexec_buffer) {
> - pr_err("Not enough memory for the kexec measurement buffer.\n");
> + ret = ima_allocate_buf_at_kexec_load();
> + if (ret < 0)
> return;
> - }
>
> kbuf.buffer = kexec_buffer;
> kbuf.bufsz = kexec_buffer_size;
--
thanks,
Mimi
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-07 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-03 21:56 [PATCH 00/10] ima: measure events between kexec load and execute Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-03 21:57 ` [PATCH 01/10] ima: implement function to allocate buffer at kexec load Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-07 13:00 ` Mimi Zohar
2023-07-11 17:59 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-11 21:11 ` Mimi Zohar
2023-07-12 19:49 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-03 21:57 ` [PATCH 02/10] ima: implement function to populate buffer at kexec execute Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-07 13:00 ` Mimi Zohar
2023-07-11 18:05 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-03 21:57 ` [PATCH 03/10] ima: allocate buffer at kexec load to hold ima measurements Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-07 13:01 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2023-07-11 18:31 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-11 20:16 ` Stefan Berger
2023-07-12 19:39 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-03 21:57 ` [PATCH 04/10] ima: implement functions to suspend and resume measurements Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-03 21:57 ` [PATCH 05/10] kexec: implement functions to map and unmap segment to kimage Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-07 12:28 ` Stefan Berger
2023-07-11 18:41 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-11 19:19 ` Stefan Berger
2023-07-12 19:51 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-03 21:57 ` [PATCH 06/10] ima: update buffer at kexec execute with ima measurements Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-07 15:01 ` Mimi Zohar
2023-07-07 19:49 ` Mimi Zohar
2023-07-11 19:08 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-12 15:45 ` Mimi Zohar
2023-07-11 19:05 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-03 21:57 ` [PATCH 07/10] ima: remove function ima_dump_measurement_list Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-07 13:55 ` Mimi Zohar
2023-07-11 19:11 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-03 21:57 ` [PATCH 08/10] ima: implement and register a reboot notifier function to update kexec buffer Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-03 21:57 ` [PATCH 09/10] ima: suspend measurements while the kexec buffer is being copied Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-03 21:57 ` [PATCH 10/10] kexec: update kexec_file_load syscall to call ima_kexec_post_load Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-07 8:20 ` RuiRui Yang
2023-07-11 19:14 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-12 1:28 ` RuiRui Yang
2023-07-12 19:30 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-07 8:18 ` [PATCH 00/10] ima: measure events between kexec load and execute Dave Young
2023-07-11 17:52 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-07-07 15:55 ` Mimi Zohar
2023-07-11 17:51 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-09-22 18:59 ` Tushar Sugandhi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ef2f8f1f9ab806e010cac02aab1b64fa51ce4c2c.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bauermann@kolabnow.com \
--cc=code@tyhicks.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=noodles@fb.com \
--cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox