From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: joerg.roedel@amd.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hbabu@us.ibm.com,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] amd iommu: force flush of iommu prior during shutdown
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:57:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1wrwsuxn9.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100331182824.GC13406@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> (Neil Horman's message of "Wed\, 31 Mar 2010 14\:28\:24 -0400")
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:54:30AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> So this call amd_iommu_flush_all_devices() will be able to tell devices
>> that don't do any more DMAs and hence it is safe to reprogram iommu
>> mapping entries.
>>
> It blocks the cpu until any pending DMA operations are complete. Hmm, as I
> think about it, there is still a small possibility that a device like a NIC
> which has several buffers pre-dma-mapped could start a new dma before we
> completely disabled the iommu, althought thats small. I never saw that in my
> testing, but hitting that would be fairly difficult I think, since its literally
> just a few hundred cycles between the flush and the actual hardware disable
> operation.
>
> According to this though:
> http://support.amd.com/us/Processor_TechDocs/34434-IOMMU-Rev_1.26_2-11-09.pdf
> That window could be closed fairly easily, but simply disabling read and write
> permissions for each device table entry prior to calling flush. If we do that,
> then flush the device table, any subsequently started dma operation would just
> get noted in the error log, which we could ignore, since we're abot to boot to
> the kdump kernel anyway.
>
> Would you like me to respin w/ that modification?
Disabling permissions on all devices sounds good for the new virtualization
capable iommus. I think older iommus will still be challenged. I think
on x86 we have simply been able to avoid using those older iommus.
I like the direction you are going but please let's put this in a
paranoid iommu enable routine.
Eric
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-31 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-31 15:24 [PATCH] amd iommu: force flush of iommu prior during shutdown Neil Horman
2010-03-31 15:54 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-03-31 18:28 ` Neil Horman
2010-03-31 18:57 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2010-03-31 19:18 ` Neil Horman
2010-03-31 19:51 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-03-31 20:27 ` Neil Horman
2010-04-01 4:04 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-04-01 12:49 ` Neil Horman
2010-04-01 14:29 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-04-01 14:47 ` Neil Horman
2010-04-01 15:56 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-04-01 17:11 ` Neil Horman
2010-04-01 20:14 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-04-02 0:00 ` Neil Horman
2010-04-02 0:30 ` Chris Wright
2010-04-02 1:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/amd-iommu: enable iommu before attaching devices Chris Wright
2010-04-02 1:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/amd-iommu: warn when issuing command to uninitiailed cmd buffer Chris Wright
2010-04-02 1:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/amd-iommu: enable iommu before attaching devices Neil Horman
2010-04-02 1:38 ` Chris Wright
2010-04-02 9:11 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-04-02 23:59 ` Chris Wright
2010-04-02 15:59 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-04-02 22:38 ` Chris Wright
2010-04-02 22:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-04-02 23:57 ` Chris Wright
2010-04-03 17:38 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-04-05 14:17 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-04-05 14:32 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-04-05 15:34 ` Neil Horman
2010-03-31 18:43 ` [PATCH] amd iommu: force flush of iommu prior during shutdown Eric W. Biederman
2010-03-31 21:25 ` Chris Wright
2010-04-01 1:13 ` Neil Horman
2010-04-01 1:39 ` Chris Wright
2010-04-01 2:24 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-04-01 12:53 ` Neil Horman
2010-04-01 15:02 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-04-01 15:13 ` Neil Horman
2010-04-01 2:44 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-04-01 7:10 ` Chris Wright
2010-04-01 12:56 ` Neil Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1wrwsuxn9.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hbabu@us.ibm.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox