From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91AB2CAC59A for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2025 10:12:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type:MIME-Version: Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=4lBr/QAzBiWGNGqKC3WJ0+mxOh+6eQYMDMTmyp1Ahq8=; b=sFEZ9K/2QjlH656LjKgbVm2zWI vwZXnjMkmlchXY31hrVvgP4bB5KLedmKrXi7t3rdchEppdEuVwkiV53zmqnQVkAtjTOASq+a8v4rA SUncjkyY2nVLYOfu7MbCvqWstIraYKofrqFmFl1T6+xlEWQ/MgEysJap67jNkmRFSbqUuMpPoNxrW rhBO+8g946MVsMFTMazDC+sfod61YZezmVuyFbocw0Csc2W9bWpuuavKvXecbrBAvZsAbu0EHyMk0 7HS4ywEOem4gYQLDFw8Y9O16YOifcaHgTSe8Lt1htodYsNAcBSh0XvGQrfuW+vlp5lgW/PyIUgqER M7DsrMLg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uzBdE-0000000Gz9N-2Cce; Thu, 18 Sep 2025 10:12:52 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c0a:e001:78e:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uzBdC-0000000Gz8C-06QB for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 18 Sep 2025 10:12:51 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF4E44560; Thu, 18 Sep 2025 10:12:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 94BCBC4CEE7; Thu, 18 Sep 2025 10:12:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1758190369; bh=o1Cwy5VJ6G9kyEavxaxVgKPCYtlXDCW5Fv2OCftslK0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=Q+jbxauwtdR3DlNbHbBHKcz5hgE1MjHos4i+oNE1mJHqF5Qjt7KV/JZS934WuliS7 xuey86HpA+fq59AA7iPhj8V3tTwUVGBSBsGfH/6D11xsRXVnkN563o1RbkRkmj7Sb6 d22+zYFiTxbHSr9uYnoClv4geEe7jsUQwdPAce8XCrUFTHdVbzCvmRnc0T8rMvU+FE 9jqz6DonfGwvKKRwFGWPsEMHgySm1ktjfNWDzt5dn+XR2tUWXqTRhobZBotKDgvoyk taR4TbkICqh+e6ofP4HSEotbrqSEGGvBdDbmcvrd9COPTJzDZMoGcVXjGm+MYsvddl motQ1jDffkubA== From: Pratyush Yadav To: Mike Rapoport Cc: Andrew Morton , Alexander Graf , Baoquan He , Changyuan Lyu , Chris Li , Jason Gunthorpe , Pasha Tatashin , Pratyush Yadav , kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] kho: check if kho is finalized in __kho_preserve_order() In-Reply-To: <20250917174033.3810435-2-rppt@kernel.org> References: <20250917174033.3810435-1-rppt@kernel.org> <20250917174033.3810435-2-rppt@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 12:12:46 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250918_031250_100963_EDCE5FC0 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 7.10 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: kexec@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+kexec=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Sep 17 2025, Mike Rapoport wrote: > From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" > > Instead of checking if kho is finalized in each caller of > __kho_preserve_order(), do it in the core function itself. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) Reviewed-by: Pratyush Yadav [...] -- Regards, Pratyush Yadav