From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79AC9C87FDA for ; Fri, 8 Aug 2025 12:11:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type:MIME-Version: Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=SAHcgC2dCT7lVWSIBQiGXToCZB1mcTit8Lv2oRnEaqE=; b=sN+bY65mjpbMvb1t+W+ol1ZzTl s1UpUbwH+Qt+LKdPFbt5m+MjRySLYOG9ukoy0x048j3PDfbCwcxqhv79hD4UDacXCgzrE1YE0wCnp AQAfXVD5p6PaTgoyRCsXQ/KQq73ubBWwjQD3uG2oAW65TBpMQWuJxRwlTSAnQvHcf4pxuJF1B+OlL jmMyE+zoHWJN1JeoO+sa3XZIhmXWdeOgriNyoLgnhT7FeQm5wPuMou58AAIXNcwnIQvhkUo53ZHka 3A//BYBhZv45tJTJz8c5qg/IzL3ldYKc5qBvNv/i+ggo/AFv+F0HqdacAoPBZmrmpcnWWR/5Vvbet zHV5YyRg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ukLwz-00000002lT6-3yTX; Fri, 08 Aug 2025 12:11:57 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ukLH2-00000002fwJ-25jE for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2025 11:28:37 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 986955C655A; Fri, 8 Aug 2025 11:28:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44D52C4CEED; Fri, 8 Aug 2025 11:28:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1754652514; bh=7bjZzLfO9fl1ghbHcTqWmndQHxP4RCvD8GzQZJjMcHE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=EM9N/akdd5EknCUIRfNSycnmf+GuuLwx9r1iowOgI1VM/jPQJJWuTe2M0lx0BCn62 7ZJZSQ8QPw4PqxA3E7U0+yIrHQZQeATd5AYlunMxnVVvZWTDPCfTicAT0WobVXjfdP qAaqRL8W/f20T5FDrzmj4TI/NVMtel/Vur+PgekEOSgDoqkTqBWpz3mfJiTtWKT3kK pRUnPPM6tBDkZBCEfnDCMrAeK5NqhPOWuxZQ+FkxBCvlkPB5K7ZFj5NdL//rfUHp3r JQSeLsGt2mezuOoIzXIH5b/tSYvkvtRRvvukOVKBp96rhpHiU+4ZKlUa79r0A3m4lW p+zYV/qcchcFQ== From: Pratyush Yadav To: kernel test robot Cc: Mike Rapoport , , , , Andrew Morton , Alexander Graf , Changyuan Lyu , Pasha Tatashin , Pratyush Yadav , Shuah Khan , , Subject: Re: [linus:master] [kho] b753522bed: INFO:trying_to_register_non-static_key In-Reply-To: <202508081032.1450e413-lkp@intel.com> References: <202508081032.1450e413-lkp@intel.com> Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2025 13:28:31 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250808_042836_619845_18E6B32A X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 7.88 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: kexec@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+kexec=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Aug 08 2025, kernel test robot wrote: > Hello, > [...] > > > [ 59.011407][ T1] INFO: trying to register non-static key. > [ 59.011783][ T1] The code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe > [ 59.011783][ T1] you didn't initialize this object before use? > [ 59.011783][ T1] turning off the locking correctness validator. > [ 59.011783][ T1] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G T 6.16.0-rc5-00079-gb753522bed0b #1 PREEMPT(voluntary) > [ 59.011783][ T1] Tainted: [T]=RANDSTRUCT > [ 59.011783][ T1] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014 > [ 59.011783][ T1] Call Trace: Pasha, I think your patch [0] fixes this. Perhaps it is a good idea for it to land independent of the LUO patches, since those are likely to take some more time? [0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250807014442.3829950-2-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com/ > [ 59.011783][ T1] > [ 59.011783][ T1] dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:123) > [ 59.011783][ T1] assign_lock_key (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:988) > [ 59.011783][ T1] register_lock_class (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:?) > [ 59.011783][ T1] __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:?) > [ 59.011783][ T1] lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5871) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? xa_load_or_alloc (include/linux/xarray.h:699 kernel/kexec_handover.c:106) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? tracer_preempt_off (kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:412) > [ 59.011783][ T1] _raw_spin_lock (include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? xa_load_or_alloc (include/linux/xarray.h:699 kernel/kexec_handover.c:106) > [ 59.011783][ T1] xa_load_or_alloc (include/linux/xarray.h:699 kernel/kexec_handover.c:106) > [ 59.011783][ T1] __kho_preserve_order (kernel/kexec_handover.c:156) > [ 59.011783][ T1] kho_test_init (lib/test_kho.c:84) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? __cfi_kho_test_init (lib/test_kho.c:271) > [ 59.011783][ T1] do_one_initcall (init/main.c:1274) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? __cfi_kho_test_init (lib/test_kho.c:271) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? kasan_save_track (arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:25 mm/kasan/common.c:60 mm/kasan/common.c:69) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? kasan_save_track (mm/kasan/common.c:48 mm/kasan/common.c:68) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? __kasan_kmalloc (mm/kasan/common.c:398) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? tracer_hardirqs_off (kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:412) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? do_initcalls (include/linux/slab.h:909 include/linux/slab.h:1039 init/main.c:1345) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? kernel_init_freeable (init/main.c:1588) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? tracer_hardirqs_on (kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:452) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? tracer_hardirqs_off (kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:412) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? tracer_hardirqs_on (kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:452) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? irqentry_exit (kernel/entry/common.c:311) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? next_arg (lib/cmdline.c:273) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? parameq (kernel/params.c:91) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? parse_args (kernel/params.c:?) > [ 59.011783][ T1] do_initcall_level (init/main.c:1335) > [ 59.011783][ T1] do_initcalls (init/main.c:1349) > [ 59.011783][ T1] kernel_init_freeable (init/main.c:1588) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? __cfi_kernel_init (init/main.c:1466) > [ 59.011783][ T1] kernel_init (init/main.c:1476) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? __cfi_kernel_init (init/main.c:1466) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ret_from_fork (arch/x86/kernel/process.c:154) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ? __cfi_kernel_init (init/main.c:1466) > [ 59.011783][ T1] ret_from_fork_asm (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:255) > [ 59.011783][ T1] -- Regards, Pratyush Yadav