From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Haolong Wang" <18766350203@163.com>,
"Pasha Tatashin" <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>,
"Pratyush Yadav" <pratyush@kernel.org>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/memfd_luo: release preserved folios when retrieve fails
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 03:22:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-170773@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261014031254.432582-3-18766350203@163.com>
> retrieve() only frees the serialization structure on its error paths, but
> the folios it describes are still preserved at that point:
> memfd_luo_finish() deliberately skips its own cleanup for records whose
> retrieve() failed, since it relies on retrieve() to have released them.
> The folios and the folio array are therefore never handed back and stay
> reserved in the next kernel.
>
> Release them from retrieve() as well, by sharing the cleanup with
> memfd_luo_finish(). After the record has been validated, the folio array
> is restored before the file is allocated, so a failure from
> memfd_alloc_file() or memfd_add_seals() can release the folios directly
> instead of allocating memory while already handling a failure; a record
> this version does not support is rejected before that and uses the shared
> cleanup too. The folios may only be released while they are still fully
> preserved: once memfd_luo_retrieve_folios() has run it has consumed every
> [ ... ]
> by Sashiko AI review).
>
> Fixes: f85b1c6af5bc ("liveupdate: luo_file: remember retrieve() status")
> Assisted-by: Pi:glm-5.3-flash
> Signed-off-by: Haolong Wang <18766350203@163.com>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261014031254.432582-1-18766350203@163.com?part=2
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-14 3:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-14 3:12 [PATCH v2 0/2] mm/memfd_luo: preserve the sealed exec-bit state; fix retrieve() leaks Haolong Wang
2026-10-14 3:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/memfd_luo: carry the sealed exec-bit state in the preserved record Haolong Wang
2026-10-14 3:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 3:52 ` Haolong Wang
2026-10-14 3:12 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/memfd_luo: release preserved folios when retrieve fails Haolong Wang
2026-10-14 3:22 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-170773@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=18766350203@163.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox