From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Howells Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 08:27:34 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] KEYS: Avoid false positive ENOMEM error on key read Message-Id: <2832139.1584520054@warthog.procyon.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: References: <20200317194140.6031-5-longman@redhat.com> <20200317194140.6031-1-longman@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20200317194140.6031-5-longman@redhat.com> To: Waiman Long Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Jarkko Sakkinen , James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Mimi Zohar , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, Sumit Garg , Jerry Snitselaar , Roberto Sassu , Eric Biggers , Chris von Recklinghausen Waiman Long wrote: > +static inline void __kvzfree(const void *addr, size_t len) > +{ > + if (addr) { > + memset((void *)addr, 0, len); > + kvfree(addr); > + } > +} I wonder if that would be better as "kvfree(memset(...))" as memset() will return the address parameter. If memset is not inline, it avoids the need for the compiler to save the parameter. David