From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ED9331CA7E; Mon, 27 Oct 2025 20:11:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761595871; cv=none; b=DSbV6kVrsEXMkIkvjeofS9JuXoFlcDDtzWmJtM/Tds9CLaMcBtqRUQGY/kBVedELijkUEYTIXyd9ZmbZ0G5RcL3KxwXwsF7NcBznOxQFLIpWig1NYwm/4wpTlTrWvT8jajYNbcqEKx5ef+a6pGX1tzX/Nr3YLz2wtlmXR2kjQag= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761595871; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Rwk3W2FOk8TExlKpUy98fBN2da/O2sc56hzYXbPAcRI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=K9TfyYNOXZvIBW+51usZruPeKYIO9puJihN6m0Lcr022J6o+01A5pkpNKpI2EDfED28QH+BA13R9j3g7DDrMoAw4DnJ3sKkLKPJMwqRBlngKcEnbrUQl8ENAGvM4FeMwWhdJRLUhC0ySx5tM/VH2ItbX5dJWvt7kglYwN9tQ8W0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=dn4MF+s4; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="dn4MF+s4" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 68D1DC4CEF1; Mon, 27 Oct 2025 20:11:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1761595870; bh=Rwk3W2FOk8TExlKpUy98fBN2da/O2sc56hzYXbPAcRI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=dn4MF+s4ZAdzKC4vx01C9ZTyZ49Z1qX1mL05gU5xSm1goYlVFCR+SWxCSmCLdaHe7 /L2VTY0cBUZMWEEBwTKlhKTByI4fEsEOOCZw/sgPdp1pdnddxahot7A9egesQAalT1 cbBJCLHNfw/y++sOfP2NLKz/Uf9DahFM9R8Bgt7PYxwfZH3000uI+z4VYpEQM1bvyM wgu146QagAAAfItMzFCtmhVSb+l6FrtkMntQcI6IoIXcRKHYqTWVHySbxp41UNN3do xQD1/WG+zDuOBEYI2dEtcFtI3yyBgL0NjvzpyZe03wdhNDvWYo0GqmSI0dT1FOi7Yh FmJqeZmlOAjGw== Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 22:11:07 +0200 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Thorsten Blum Cc: David Howells , keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] keys: Fix typos in 'struct key_type' function pointer comments Message-ID: References: <20251016123619.98728-2-thorsten.blum@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: keyrings@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 10:29:57PM +0200, Thorsten Blum wrote: > On 24. Oct 2025, at 21:04, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 02:36:19PM +0200, Thorsten Blum wrote: > >> s/it/if/ and s/revokation/revocation/ > >> ... > > > > The comment is also formatted incorrectly. It should be: > > > > /* > > * Free preparsed match data (optional). This should be supplied if > > * ->match_preparse() is supplied. > > */ > > The other struct fields are all commented with the first sentence > starting after the '/*'. > > I can fix this one trailing '*/' in v2, but the others should probably > be fixed in a separate patch? We don't want to batch update to all comments in this file as that e.g. has more drawbacks than benefits because it increases the probability of merge conflicts during backports. I.e. 1. Refine the patch to address the remark that were anyhow modified. 2. Don't update any other comments just for the remark I did. > > Thanks, > Thorsten > BR, Jarkko