From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04AB91B142D for ; Sat, 5 Sep 2026 01:49:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788572947; cv=none; b=s0gHmhW3WWJrn0Yv20FtSq4J8Orqig7/rIHbJtbO1wPX6Z09YjDkWiqK/RSKFSvhDOtOuDSzfrz7bG9pnoo5T3azUedxmkF/Z5Vg5pPJ/U5mcin+JDeU8r8m2+l71disQ/kL6IMb2fo05XvUUkGKENsGFH8pBpbZUHMzj4Kdazo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788572947; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZgJPZ0RSSJ2Qv/5DYd6BONJ4R0Wir+SDkktucoFqaIs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=JuDNo7m6UXeCdPtgq+Etqbj4gyRbLnNCehmsCCGhSYTPPCY+/fXyer3iPbjlTnM53NjfuwkzprLJdYgndW0qsTLpBHvU8N2UW625FZVYXIDG78JupNegBCjYuA8dd9YzYcfLfBax9qMRyU7x/Z4gyFlvvNxO0Z4Y62cpI8VSf34= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.b=eDlGBmxK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.b="eDlGBmxK" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5FAC21F00A3D; Sat, 5 Sep 2026 01:49:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1788572945; bh=KCBYjcBFetUWiGPrDed8yUUBijDv19BEMzZKI5J4qV0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=eDlGBmxKLAPDXze9I+yiFfYENCMQ5z1fJQxEGrxKHHElfHyeZm4clDBI6c5oAQtc/ 3uFpqRY9DCGA6F3bYz79PRJP0bm3YnBI8/F3Np/0/yONEbGM0Id3GF2ovpApA/vE10 4fEU2PnlWKZsry0WjytqVtJJusAqFU1epNkc2IRM= Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2026 18:49:04 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Linus Torvalds Cc: "Luck, Tony" , "ksummit@lists.linux.dev" , Roman Gushchin Subject: Re: How to credit Sashiko with a Reported-by tag? Message-Id: <20260904184904.7c62db0868ccb7d86fac3fea@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.8.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: ksummit@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 4 Sep 2026 13:18:35 -0700 Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, 4 Sept 2026 at 11:27, Luck, Tony wrote: > > > > I see 30 different variations so far. Most popular are: > > > > 211 Reported-by: Sashiko > > 142 Reported-by: sashiko-bot > > You missed a few other variations: > > Link: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/... > > or > > Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/... > > which are sometimes - but certainly not always - accompanied by > Reported-by lines. > > And quite a few times I've seen Sashiko mentioned just in the > free-form prose section. > > Honestly, I don't think it matters which pattern ends up being used. > It's not like the bot is going to be upset about the different > spellings, so all that matters is that people see "oh, Sashiko did > something here". There are people (Roman is one) who trawl the commit logs to get an understanding of how effective/useful Sashiko is being. I expect that some standardization in how changelogs reference Sashiko might help in this work. Roman? (Last I checked, nearly 1000 commits mention Sashiko. God that's a lot of bugs we either fixed or didn't add!) (And nice statistics for this will perhaps help persuade Google to keep funding the thing)