Re: [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] [0/4] Common scenario for four proposals regarding regressions

Mark Brown
2024-06-18T15:50:36Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1265 bytes --]

On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 10:43:49AM -0400, James Bottomley wrote:

> So what should we do about this? I think the first thing is to
> recognize the important role stable plays in actually finding bugs.
> There already is a -rc tree for stable, but it doesn't actually seem to
> be very useful in finding bugs (likely because the pool of testers is
> too small), so perhaps we should discuss whether we could expand this,
> or whether we really accept that non-rc stable is part of our testing
> infrastructure.

The pool of testers is quite small, and the turnarounds for responses
are relatively tight which precludes certain kinds of testing.

> The other thing I think would help is better tooling and advice to help
> reporters find regressions in stable. What we do a lot upstream is ask
> if they can reproduce it in mainline. However, not everyone is
> equipped to test out mainline kernels, so we could do with helping them
> bisect it in stable (note this can be time dependent: older stable
> trees more naturally give rise to the question "has this been fixed
> upstream" making mainline testing more of an imperative).

Also questions like "can I get this building and running without
reworking my development infrastructure".

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]