Re: linus-next: improving functional testing for to-be-merged pull requests

Mark Brown
2024-10-24T11:08:33Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 683 bytes --]

On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 05:49:09AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:

> So basically, all I need to do to satisfy your request is to add fixes
> branch that I push to that is pushed after it passes my tests (and not
> the urgent branch that is still being tested and may have bugs) and
> then have that be added to linux-next?

> Now I have been batching changes and not send a pull request right
> after my tests pass. I've been sending a pull request at most now once
> a week. So I could have this branch hold the code that's already been
> tested.

Yes, that's what pretty much everyone is doing here. Generally we find
very few issues this way but it's certainly a non-zero number.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]