From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ej1-f48.google.com (mail-ej1-f48.google.com [209.85.218.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8729A47F3C1 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2026 07:02:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.218.48 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792393359; cv=none; b=FRgEr1sNX15L17f8R7fWhd90lZaNzJ7BVYyjRT+G8KGwopKugmaEmWY6Zk9XBrclD8HHKB4yRrm7Nx8QbtRJU/esyuACsA0gNn5Xmoj12+4/rPwROMew9g9VdEDnJlnV2bV1DWN33lS+Eh2h1bIByYS2IoRC/L8BKBatbrqTGDQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792393359; c=relaxed/simple; bh=caiOAC3ZMfnRb6Cow7Tm52Ond6WJxeDuC6N5cXWzJ0Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=rnNGavVfRzEMxzWdpE4DTofn7G1r9dY2GgJ47zZhxVjlPPIXpr9bCbc/SOLYC5bTlBlQsCf0S80dqwKNKsTKTFSogDFtjFPc/fRv+LqmFUeEIgfSKwRkVfx1UiTqkmz8rbeeSI69EdFP9ltAtHfFy9t7NWfUAS0+QAYQSGdI0m8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=lzMx6Oy5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.218.48 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="lzMx6Oy5" Received: by mail-ej1-f48.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-c3fd91337baso221794666b.3 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2026 00:02:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1792393357; x=1792998157; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=ss1sPKwGjZIHMoq6AIRLY4p1Jhwf9GL2A3EDWJrTFIM=; b=lzMx6Oy5vYpyFkG4QUfat7cUtL3mG12Ggohn5AbPeWa3lg2VqpDNHgaqYc4i9OsV2s hjcc9J3o+vFf0NwH/U7DSPIMJ/WhWs97TvfmuZI+uwkRdV0/OR+3rkSw0nUNB+wbsRsT NHkzRY4+EV2n9b+ItaOqp6jSLK3nWSSbx9F2DwcdDnQT11IUOJ3dYSH9dGJlLk3iFiAp gH+yAgpteQRuf07sp/eSsuGpApUr+HiBOBO/E62AzR4zEIm8S8bvisAOA1ho6xum0VWj 9poZVlPe8+AOducSiHHe4VXY8UBaGh89SSrMQG+HNw/RlrjepMhBICVeLu4zOQYt8RXF J3vA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20260707; t=1792393357; x=1792998157; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=ss1sPKwGjZIHMoq6AIRLY4p1Jhwf9GL2A3EDWJrTFIM=; b=f2yKCtJX1SiZ84skNewUF9RxGBpEluWrGcs41r/t/tDIPUkG2v3fKql+HWdFjWTgsQ 28qJKhcxACtrWPvJ7jkC/U94eiJTqzXFMbvFy3jL9BldTYmoSdBfn/sTbxa9uyXeYdiN P4/PYz7d3FYWo0QyuYSbkCoYan6ej41ByVHyr/W/oQz75yW5CXV3hV9UnaeKySJ67Psj KQDQiP7tHwiGgYM1ozS7LPeTr9T24tCsqKPhtlSa//Bi0nVxshPFf8WR33YZ+jjnrv+K j9mU5WcInNt8NHABpfi44klira384Db2vfEFY8kLgFyziJGR10quUbgJyWrDYovN9s05 h2nw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AKwUvBwW+ZOe/4fYTgmjmDeLju267O4UysKt0zjzbmjKW1nj89RdFIxea4nR1pcvugvhXvoCJthuJgG/@lists.linux.dev X-Gm-Message-State: AFq9FYKkQN1glp+vwrUkldeh0HyrYvblIg7dY5dZYif2rswYX4E+TDCI GI9d86Uz3No093FcSTskTcoa0N0m9V1rW2PqUTVxdbkiP7Se9IefpTrLbAGha/C3Y9SbICVx X-Gm-Gg: AYBFou11YxPZ/N/KaTL5+vP8tD5SPcmz2A5JfKEvYjBm2laddm+PxfTzr9+gOORRr+o s2dLqy1O54Zwk5WPPrctn4STgKACa4Ax0LHctlXR9RTberb2rWmTsSTlfYY4CplvF3jxjxDc5an HwlGkiUZa8runuHeK7eftt182zLKl/AmUXdPOISCD+G8DBYNHf6+p/jh47AogOu3syZqDPiz77s Wuqdd9B7Sz7/cMGyCTvnDbUc5VVMRJhm/Q2mcJa1nqG1+S4GXg0IdltGfC7na41C/VKDJBoJNZE mX8puCJb9C9yYZ/lwIx7/lXBngR4IGomyJZxscqp4B3LHLkIFQdq/s8ER1Ka/MUxDGfRgi9kyIs PHqaMCrJfoixFyYwpV1xK+N8BvEemn2iRkwPT4SHJEF2WPGLzdePwIh167+htufkXgK8+/YmzlU DNgi4wYC5IpSOX9rG7uj1kDESXpy/dVpdp54X7sxXIm2THPmo2qxPrzEvV0pcEt+Y8FFk= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:478c:b0:c31:7495:e5b with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-c419d05ed13mr457742666b.10.1792393356319; Mon, 19 Oct 2026 00:02:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2c0f:3d00:6be:8900:ce5e:9212:ea4b:f30]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-48dfd4ec8dfsm22184171f8f.26.2026.10.19.00.02.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 19 Oct 2026 00:02:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 10:02:32 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: Arnaldo Melo Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , Jiri Kosina , ksummit@lists.linux.dev, sashiko@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: Patch pre-submission to Sashiko Message-ID: References: <49D0633D-3576-4F42-9934-85663D11EC15@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: ksummit@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49D0633D-3576-4F42-9934-85663D11EC15@gmail.com> On Sat, Oct 17, 2026 at 03:38:36PM -0300, Arnaldo Melo wrote: > > > On October 17, 2026 3:20:47 PM GMT-03:00, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > >On Sat Oct 17, 2026 at 5:28 PM UTC, Jiri Kosina wrote: > >> > >> [ in the spirit of the concluding discussion at this year's maintainers > >> summit, I'm using this list outside of actual maintainer summit > >> planning :) ] > >> > >> I have just received a v1 to v11 patchset submission within roughly one > >> day timeframe. > >> > >> Neither myself nor anyone else did comment with any review feedback, > >> except for Sashiko. Which I believe is what triggered all the immediate > >> resubmissions. > >> > >> I don't think this is sustanable. > > > >I think it's just fine. I encourage developers to keep the spam going. > > Yay, agreed, it's not like before AI people were reading all of lkml I read everything that's sent to drivers/staging. I've read it in the order that it arrives and I've done that since 2010... But these days people are treating the list like a pre-submit AI checker which sucks. I feel like people are saying we should just accept that mailing lists are just AI checker interfaces instead of being intended for humans... I think adding a 24 hour delay to the AI review solves this. It seems to be working for networking. It will likely push people to use AI locally which is even better. > (or other voluminous lists) traffic, just ignore what clearly is a > conversation that now happens way faster than in the past until you > see it calmed down > > The problem was not getting feedback at all, now people complain that > feedback is being provided timely and then that people are responding > to feedback in a timely fashion? That has never been a problem on drivers/staging. Greg responds to every email and when he was on vacation then I responded to every email. regards, dan carpenter