From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: kvm-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: qemu-kvm.git now live
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:32:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49F9C491.80205@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49F08BD0.6000706@redhat.com>
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Avi Kivity wrote:
>>
>>>>>> Where/how does the
>>>>>> migration code disable dirty logging?
>>>>>>
>>>>> Should be phase 3 of ram_save_live().
>>>>>
>>>> But only in qemu-kvm. What is the plan about pushing it upstream? Then
>>>> we could discuss how to extend the exiting support best.
>>>>
>>> Pushing things upstream is quite difficult because of the very different
>>> infrastructure.
>>>
>>
>> Isn't the midterm goal to get rid of most of these differences (namely
>> libkvm)?
>>
>
> Yes, but not by removing existing functionality.
No one said this.
>
>>
>>> It's unfortunate that upstream rewrote everything
>>> instead of changing things incrementally. Rewrites are almost always a
>>> mistake since they throw away accumulated knowledge.
>>>
>>
>> I disagree, at least in this particular case. Upstream already diverged
>> from qemu-kvm, and the latter provided no comparable alternative for
>> slot management and dirty logging. And I still don't see that we lost
>> anything that could not easily be re-integrated into upstream (ie.
>> global dirty logging), finally leading to a cleaner and more complete
>> result.
>>
>
> It could have been done differently, by morphing the existing support
> into something mergable, and merging that. In this way, we'd ensure no
> needed functionality is lost.
The existing support lacked features upstream already had and instead
required additional hacks to make qemu-kvm work.
>
> As is, we're adding something simple, then discovering it's
> insufficient. We're throwing away information, that's not a good way to
> make progress.
I doubt this applies here.
>
>> So, what bits are missing to make KVM migration work in upstream?
>>
>
> I don't know of anything beyond dirty logging.
>
OK, then I will pick this up and have a look at something comparable to
cpu_physical_memory_set_dirty_tracking() for upstream.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-30 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-23 15:40 qemu-kvm.git now live Avi Kivity
2009-04-29 8:49 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-04-29 10:42 ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-29 10:55 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-04-29 11:12 ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-29 11:31 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-04-29 14:40 ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-29 15:42 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-04-30 9:12 ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-30 9:29 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-04-30 10:54 ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-30 15:32 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2009-04-30 15:43 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49F9C491.80205@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kvm-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox