From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: kvm-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 6/6] KVM: introduce a new API for getting dirty
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:57:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BD18B1D.1080604@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100420200353.2d2a6dec.yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>
On 04/23/2010 01:20 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>> I would say the reason is that if we did not convert the user-space pointer to
>> a "void *" kvm_get_dirty_log() would end up copying the dirty log to
>>
>> (log->dirty_bitmap<< 32) | 0x00000000
>>
> Well yes, that was the problem. If we always set the __u64 value to the pointer we're safe though.
>
> union {
> void *p;
> __u64 q;
> }
>
> void x(void *r)
> {
> // breaks:
> p = r;
>
> // works:
> q = (ulong)r;
> }
>
In that case it's better to avoid p altogether, since users will
naturally assign to the pointer.
Using a 64-bit integer avoids the problem (though perhaps not sufficient
for s390, Arnd?)
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-23 11:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-20 11:03 [PATCH RFC v2 6/6] KVM: introduce a new API for getting dirty Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-04-20 11:15 ` [PATCH RFC v2 6/6] KVM: introduce a new API for getting dirty bitmaps Alexander Graf
2010-04-20 11:33 ` Alexander Graf
2010-04-20 11:33 ` [PATCH RFC v2 6/6] KVM: introduce a new API for getting dirty Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-04-20 11:44 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-04-21 8:29 `
2010-04-21 9:41 ` [PATCH RFC v2 6/6] KVM: introduce a new API for getting dirty bitmaps Alexander Graf
2010-04-21 11:46 ` [PATCH RFC v2 6/6] KVM: introduce a new API for getting dirty Avi Kivity
2010-04-22 2:45 `
2010-04-22 6:09 `
2010-04-22 9:34 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-04-22 23:29 ` [PATCH RFC v2 6/6] KVM: introduce a new API for getting dirty bitmaps Alexander Graf
2010-04-23 10:17 ` [PATCH RFC v2 6/6] KVM: introduce a new API for getting dirty
2010-04-23 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC v2 6/6] KVM: introduce a new API for getting dirty bitmaps Alexander Graf
2010-04-23 11:57 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-04-23 11:58 ` [PATCH RFC v2 6/6] KVM: introduce a new API for getting dirty Avi Kivity
2010-04-23 12:26 ` [PATCH RFC v2 6/6] KVM: introduce a new API for getting dirty bitmaps Alexander Graf
2010-04-23 12:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-23 12:42 ` [PATCH RFC v2 6/6] KVM: introduce a new API for getting dirty Avi Kivity
2010-04-23 12:46 ` [PATCH RFC v2 6/6] KVM: introduce a new API for getting dirty bitmaps Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-23 12:53 ` [PATCH RFC v2 6/6] KVM: introduce a new API for getting dirty Avi Kivity
2010-04-23 12:59 ` [PATCH RFC v2 6/6] KVM: introduce a new API for getting dirty bitmaps Alexander Graf
2010-04-23 13:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-23 13:20 ` [PATCH RFC v2 6/6] KVM: introduce a new API for getting dirty Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BD18B1D.1080604@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox