Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: Clean up vm creation and release

[Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>]

On 11/09/2010 11:01 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 09.11.2010, at 17:02, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
> >  IA64 support forces us to abstract the allocation of the kvm structure.
> >  But instead of mixing this up with arch-specific initialization and
> >  doing the same on destruction, split both steps. This allows to move
> >  generic destruction calls into generic code.
> >
> >  It also fixes error clean-up on failures of kvm_create_vm for IA64.
> >
> >  Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka<jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
> >  ---
> >
> >  Changes in v2:
> >  - Fixed s390 conversion and added linux/slab.h
> >    as remarked by Christian (thanks!)
> >
> >  arch/ia64/include/asm/kvm_host.h |    4 ++++
> >  arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c         |   28 +++++++---------------------
> >  arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c       |   20 +++-----------------
> >  arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c         |   23 ++++++-----------------
> >  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c               |   12 ++----------
> >  include/linux/kvm_host.h         |   15 ++++++++++++++-
> >  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c              |   19 +++++++++++++------
> >  7 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
> >
> >  diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> >  index 2f229e5..2689ee5 100644
> >  --- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> >  +++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> >  @@ -590,6 +590,10 @@ int kvm_emulate_halt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> >  int kvm_pal_emul(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run);
> >  void kvm_sal_emul(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> >
> >  +#define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_VM_ALLOC 1
> >  +struct kvm *kvm_arch_alloc_vm(void);
> >  +void kvm_arch_free_vm(struct kvm *kvm);
> >  +
> >  #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__*/
> >
> >  #endif
> >  diff --git a/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c b/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c
> >  index f56a631..48a48bd 100644
> >  --- a/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c
> >  +++ b/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c
> >  @@ -749,7 +749,7 @@ out:
> >  	return r;
> >  }
> >
> >  -static struct kvm *kvm_alloc_kvm(void)
> >  +struct kvm *kvm_arch_alloc_vm(void)
> >  {
> >
> >  	struct kvm *kvm;
> >  @@ -760,7 +760,7 @@ static struct kvm *kvm_alloc_kvm(void)
> >  	vm_base = __get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL, get_order(KVM_VM_DATA_SIZE));
> >
> >  	if (!vm_base)
> >  -		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> >  +		return NULL;
> >
> >  	memset((void *)vm_base, 0, KVM_VM_DATA_SIZE);
> >  	kvm = (struct kvm *)(vm_base +
> >  @@ -806,10 +806,12 @@ static void kvm_build_io_pmt(struct kvm *kvm)
> >  #define GUEST_PHYSICAL_RR4	0x2739
> >  #define VMM_INIT_RR		0x1660
> >
> >  -static void kvm_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
> >  +int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
> >  {
> >  	BUG_ON(!kvm);
> >
> >  +	kvm->arch.is_sn2 = ia64_platform_is("sn2");
> >  +
> >  	kvm->arch.metaphysical_rr0 = GUEST_PHYSICAL_RR0;
> >  	kvm->arch.metaphysical_rr4 = GUEST_PHYSICAL_RR4;
> >  	kvm->arch.vmm_init_rr = VMM_INIT_RR;
> >  @@ -823,21 +825,8 @@ static void kvm_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
> >
> >  	/* Reserve bit 0 of irq_sources_bitmap for userspace irq source */
> >  	set_bit(KVM_USERSPACE_IRQ_SOURCE_ID,&kvm->arch.irq_sources_bitmap);
> >  -}
> >  -
> >  -struct  kvm *kvm_arch_create_vm(void)
> >  -{
> >  -	struct kvm *kvm = kvm_alloc_kvm();
> >  -
> >  -	if (IS_ERR(kvm))
> >  -		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> >  -
> >  -	kvm->arch.is_sn2 = ia64_platform_is("sn2");
> >  -
> >  -	kvm_init_vm(kvm);
> >  -
> >  -	return kvm;
> >
> >  +	return 0;
> >  }
> >
> >  static int kvm_vm_ioctl_get_irqchip(struct kvm *kvm,
> >  @@ -1357,7 +1346,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_guest_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >  	return -EINVAL;
> >  }
> >
> >  -static void free_kvm(struct kvm *kvm)
> >  +void kvm_arch_free_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
> >  {
> >  	unsigned long vm_base = kvm->arch.vm_base;
> >
> >  @@ -1399,9 +1388,6 @@ void kvm_arch_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
> >  #endif
> >  	kfree(kvm->arch.vioapic);
> >  	kvm_release_vm_pages(kvm);
> >  -	kvm_free_physmem(kvm);
> >  -	cleanup_srcu_struct(&kvm->srcu);
> >  -	free_kvm(kvm);
> >  }
> >
> >  void kvm_arch_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >  diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> >  index 38f756f..ce3dd65 100644
> >  --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> >  +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> >  @@ -145,18 +145,12 @@ void kvm_arch_check_processor_compat(void *rtn)
> >  	*(int *)rtn = kvmppc_core_check_processor_compat();
> >  }
> >
> >  -struct kvm *kvm_arch_create_vm(void)
> >  +int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *)
>
> Eh, no. This doesn't compile :).

What's the problem? lack of a formal argument?


> Apart from that, the code seems to work on ppc64.
>
>
> Tested-by: Alexander Graf<agraf@suse.de>
>

Seems my ppc builder has died, so thanks for the test.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function