Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: irqfd generalization prepare patch set

Alexander Graf
2013-04-25T09:39:22Z

On 21.04.2013, at 12:51, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 07:26:08PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> The concept of an irqfd and interrupt routing are nothing particularly tied
>> into the IOAPIC implementation. In fact, most of the code already is perfectly
>> generic.
>>
>> This patch set decouples most bits of the existing irqchip and irqfd
>> implementation to make it reusable for non-IOAPIC platforms, like the PPC MPIC.
>>
>> I also have a patch that implements working irqfd support on top of these,
>> but that requires the in-kernel MPIC implementation to go upstream first, so
>> I'm holding off on it until we settled everything there, so the concept
>> certainly does work.
>>
>> Alex
>
> Nothing to object to here really, this is just
> moving code around.
> And patches 3 and 4 are definitely cleanups.
> Assuming this helps PPC gain in-kernel irqchip support:
>
> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

Could you please check the newer version of this patch set again and give your ack if it still holds?

http://www.mail-archive.com/kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org/msg06214.html

Alex