From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:39:28 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] KVM: PPC: Add support for multiple-TCE hcalls Message-Id: <1373546368.19894.87.camel@pasglop> List-Id: References: <1373123227-22969-1-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru> <1373123227-22969-7-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru> <51DC4228.7010607@suse.de> <51DCEA76.9070808@ozlabs.ru> <51DE3ECB.7080803@ozlabs.ru> <43E93931-F213-47CC-ADCF-D3A6D6BC4372@suse.de> <51DE8EE9.2000508@ozlabs.ru> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Alexander Graf Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, David Gibson , Paul Mackerras , Alex Williamson , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 13:15 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: > And that's bad. Jeez, seriously. Don't argue this case. We enable new > features individually unless we're 100% sure we can keep everything > working. In this case an ENABLE_CAP doesn't hurt at all, because user > space still needs to handle the hypercalls if it wants them anyways. > But you get debugging for free for example. An ENABLE_CAP is utterly pointless. More bloat. But you seem to like it :-) Ben.