From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Suraj Jitindar Singh Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 01:45:16 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix handling of h_set_dawr Message-Id: <1560995116.4771.1.camel@gmail.com> List-Id: References: <20190617071619.19360-1-sjitindarsingh@gmail.com> <87e219c8-1db7-9976-03ce-5a566a8df7ab@kaod.org> In-Reply-To: <87e219c8-1db7-9976-03ce-5a566a8df7ab@kaod.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?C=E9dric?= Le Goater , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: mikey@neuling.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2019-06-17 at 11:06 +0200, C=C3=A9dric Le Goater wrote: > On 17/06/2019 09:16, Suraj Jitindar Singh wrote: > > Series contains 2 patches to fix the host in kernel handling of the > > hcall > > h_set_dawr. > >=20 > > First patch from Michael Neuling is just a resend added here for > > clarity. > >=20 > > Michael Neuling (1): > > KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Fix r3 corruption in h_set_dabr() > >=20 > > Suraj Jitindar Singh (1): > > KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Only write DAWR[X] when handling h_set_dawr > > in > > real mode >=20 >=20 >=20 > Reviewed-by: C=C3=A9dric Le Goater >=20 > and=20 >=20 > Tested-by: C=C3=A9dric Le Goater >=20 >=20 > but I see slowdowns in nested as if the IPIs were not delivered. Have > we > touch this part in 5.2 ?=20 Hi, I've seen the same and tracked it down to decrementer exceptions not being delivered when the guest is using large decrementer. I've got a patch I'm about to send so I'll CC you. Another option is to disable the large decrementer with: -machine pseries,cap-large-decr=FAlse Thanks, Suraj >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > C. >=20