From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 11:28:00 +0000
Subject: Re: [PULL 00/12] ppc patch queue 2012-10-30
Message-Id: <20121031112800.GB32510@amt.cnet>
List-Id: <kvm-ppc.vger.kernel.org>
References: <1351591345-23071-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de>
 <20121031013255.GC21986@amt.cnet>
 <BF370EC4-EBF9-4C03-A10F-5DF784C064B6@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <BF370EC4-EBF9-4C03-A10F-5DF784C064B6@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, kvm-ppc <kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:22:55AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> 
> 
> On 31.10.2012, at 02:32, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:02:13AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >> Hi Avi / Marcelo,
> >> 
> >> This is my current patch queue for ppc.  Please pull.
> >> 
> >> Headline changes are:
> >> 
> >>  * Fix 440 target
> >>  * Fix uapi conflict
> > 
> > Can you regenerate against queue branch? (btw i forgot to update fsl_hcalls.h...).
> 
> Hrm. So which branch am I supposed to base against? Master, next or queue? This one is against next...
> 
> Alex

queue