From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 14:22:55 +0000 Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2] MAINTAINERS: Add a section for powerpc Message-Id: <20160425142255.GC2386@potion> List-Id: References: <1461348774-29853-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com> <20160422181954.txv4gdtxurifwtob@hawk.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20160422181954.txv4gdtxurifwtob@hawk.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Andrew Jones Cc: Thomas Huth , kvm@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, lvivier@redhat.com, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, mtosatti@redhat.com 2016-04-22 20:19+0200, Andrew Jones: > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 08:12:54PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: >> +POWERPC >> +M: Laurent Vivier >> +M: Thomas Huth >> +L: kvm@vger.kernel.org >> +L: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org >> +F: powerpc/* >> +F: lib/powerpc/* >> +F: lib/ppc64/* > > Looks like MAINTAINERS files usually have the sections in alphabetical > order (or least the kernel does), so we should probably have put > POWERPC in between ARM and x86 (and x86 should be X86). But, has a > MAINTAINERS file update ever gone to a v3 :-)? I can (and will if you don't protest) change that before pushing. > But, has a > MAINTAINERS file update ever gone to a v3 :-)? (And we could ask to change the heading to "PowerPC" for v4. :])