From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: peterz@infradead.org Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 18:47:59 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] powerpc/pseries: implement paravirt qspinlocks for SPLPAR Message-Id: <20200723184759.GS119549@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> List-Id: References: <20200706043540.1563616-1-npiggin@gmail.com> <20200706043540.1563616-6-npiggin@gmail.com> <874kqhvu1v.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> <8265d782-4e50-a9b2-a908-0cb588ffa09c@redhat.com> <20200723140011.GR5523@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> <845de183-56f5-2958-3159-faa131d46401@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <845de183-56f5-2958-3159-faa131d46401@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Waiman Long Cc: Michael Ellerman , Nicholas Piggin , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Will Deacon , Boqun Feng , Ingo Molnar , Anton Blanchard , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 02:32:36PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > BTW, do you have any comment on my v2 lock holder cpu info qspinlock patch? > I will have to update the patch to fix the reported 0-day test problem, but > I want to collect other feedback before sending out v3. I want to say I hate it all, it adds instructions to a path we spend an aweful lot of time optimizing without really getting anything back for it. Will, how do you feel about it?