From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sean Christopherson Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 03:52:57 +0000 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] KVM: x86: Use KVM_BUG/KVM_BUG_ON to handle bugs that are fatal to the VM Message-Id: <20200929035257.GH31514@linux.intel.com> List-Id: References: <20200923224530.17735-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> <20200923224530.17735-4-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> <878scze4l5.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> <20200924181134.GB9649@linux.intel.com> <87k0wichht.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> <20200925171233.GC31528@linux.intel.com> <731dd323-8c66-77ff-cf15-4bbdea34bcf9@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <731dd323-8c66-77ff-cf15-4bbdea34bcf9@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier , James Morse , Julien Thierry , Suzuki K Poulose , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Huacai Chen , Aleksandar Markovic , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, Christian Borntraeger , Janosch Frank , David Hildenbrand , Cornelia Huck , Claudio Imbrenda On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 11:06:10PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 25/09/20 19:12, Sean Christopherson wrote: > >> Do we actually want to prevent *all* ioctls? E.g. when 'vm bugged' > >> condition is triggered userspace may want to extract some information to > >> assist debugging but even things like KVM_GET_[S]REGS will just return > >> -EIO. I'm not sure it is generally safe to enable *everything* (except > >> for KVM_RUN which should definitely be forbidden) so maybe your approach > >> is preferable. > > > > The answer to this probably depends on the answer to the first question of > > when it's appropriate to use KVM_BUG(). E.g. if we limit usage to fatal or > > dangrous cases, then blocking all ioctls() is probably the right thing do do. > > I think usage should be limited to dangerous cases, basically WARN_ON > level. However I agree with Vitaly that KVM_GET_* should be allowed. Makes sense. On the topic of feedback from Vitaly, while dredging through my mailbox I rediscovered his suggestion of kvm->kvm_internal_bug (or maybe just kvm->internal_bug) instead of kvm->vm_bugged[*]. Like past me, I like the "internal" variants better. [*] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190930153358.GD14693@linux.intel.com > The other question is whether to return -EIO or KVM_EXIT_INTERNAL_ERROR. > The latter is more likely to be handled already by userspace. And probably less confusing for unsuspecting users. E.g. -EIO is most likely to be interpreted as "I screwed up", whereas KVM_EXIT_INTERNAL_ERROR will correctly be read as "KVM screwed up".