From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 11:46:08 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 3/5] KVM: stats: Add documentation for binary statistics interface Message-Id: <348aa108-076b-04dd-9fd2-e840a7a85f5d@redhat.com> List-Id: References: <20210617044146.2667540-1-jingzhangos@google.com> <20210617044146.2667540-4-jingzhangos@google.com> <0d959828-da89-bceb-f7cc-35622a60c431@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Greg KH , "Gustavo A. R. Silva" Cc: Jing Zhang , KVM , KVMARM , LinuxMIPS , KVMPPC , LinuxS390 , Linuxkselftest , Marc Zyngier , James Morse , Julien Thierry , Suzuki K Poulose , Will Deacon , Huacai Chen , Aleksandar Markovic , Thomas Bogendoerfer , Paul Mackerras , Christian Borntraeger , Janosch Frank , David Hildenbrand , Cornelia Huck , Claudio Imbrenda , Sean Christopherson , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Jim Mattson , Peter Shier , Oliver Upton , David Rientjes , Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito , David Matlack , Ricardo Koller , Krish Sadhukhan , Fuad Tabba On 17/06/21 13:42, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 01:29:22PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> On 17/06/21 07:56, Greg KH wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 04:41:44AM +0000, Jing Zhang wrote: >>>> +string starts at the end of ``struct kvm_stats_desc``. >>>> +The maximum length (including trailing '\0') is indicated by ``name_size`` >>>> +in ``struct kvm_stats_header``. >>> >>> I thought we were replacing [0] arrays with [], are you sure you should >>> be declaring this as [0]? Same for all structures in this document (and >>> code). >> >> In C code [0] is a bit more flexible than []. I think in this particular >> case [] won't work due to how the structures are declared. In the >> documentation [] is certainly clearer. > > Look at all of the patches that Gustavo has been doing all over the tree > for this work, you do not want to make him do this again here. > > Gustavo, is [0] ok for fields like these? I should be able to get back to KVM stuff later today, I'll check myself if [] can be applied and reply. I had queued an early version of these for my local build to play with them but I haven't been able to do a complete review. Paolo