From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 15:48:06 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: ppc: fix Kconfig constraints
Message-Id: <49170636.2030003@redhat.com>
List-Id: <kvm-ppc.vger.kernel.org>
References: <7ef9d93760395985e11f.1226085033@localhost.localdomain> <1226085313.9309.26.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4916B5CE.1080605@redhat.com> <20081109154314.GA21374@uranus.ravnborg.org>
In-Reply-To: <20081109154314.GA21374@uranus.ravnborg.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com>, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org

Sam Ravnborg wrote:

 

>> I have a vague memory that 'select' will not propagate (what's the word? 
>> transitive?) - -that is, the 'select KVM' will enable KVM but will not 
>> cause ANON_INODES and PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS to be set.
>>     
> I'm glad to say your memory in this case is wrong.
>
>   

Me, too.

> Select works recursively so the usage above is OK.
>
> If KVM had a dependency such as EXPERIMENTAL then
> select would enable KVM no matter the value of EXPERIMENTAL.
>   

Right, I misremembered this property.  Thanks for the clarification.

Hollis, I'll apply your patch.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function