From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:31:16 +0000
Subject: Re: qemu-kvm.git now live
Message-Id: <49F81054.4010102@redhat.com>
List-Id: <kvm-ppc.vger.kernel.org>
References: <49F08BD0.6000706@redhat.com>	 <1240955602.24625.57.camel@slate.austin.ibm.com>	 <49F78134.30904@codemonkey.ws> <1240957999.24625.60.camel@slate.austin.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <1240957999.24625.60.camel-EGjIuKC2qUdB0N6nvOmcJFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <anthony-rdkfGonbjUSkNkDKm+mE6A@public.gmane.org>, KVM list <kvm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>, kvm-ppc <kvm-ppc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>

Hollis Blanchard wrote:
>> Since PPC is now supported in upstream QEMU, does it really matter if it 
>> works in qemu-kvm.git?
>>     
>
> I was going to take that position too, except Avi asked me specifically
> if some of the code inside TARGET_I386 ifdefs in qemu-kvm.c works for
> other architectures.
>
>   

In that case it's sufficient to have the build system use the upstream 
kvm integration (CONFIG_KVM) rather than the qemu-kvm integration (USE_KVM).

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.