Kernel KVM-PPC virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/23] Add KVM support for PPC64 (970) hosts
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 08:06:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A545396.4020404@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1246976262-4826-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de>

On 07/08/2009 09:22 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 19:08 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>    
>>> Or is using mmu_notifiers mandatory? :-).
>>>        
>> It's highly recommended.
>>      
>
> Considering how "differnent" the ppc MMU is, I'm not sure mmu notifiers
> is necessarily the right approach but we definitely should have a close
> look.
>    

I don't see how the mmu structure matters.  All mmu notifiers does is 
tell you when Linux wants to drop a pte, it's completely up to you how 
to use this information.

There are three ways of dealing with the problem:

- ignore it (ia64, ppc)

Easy to implement, but you can't swap or do any fancy stuff like page 
migration.  If you have a large tlb/shadow, you pin a lot of pages.

- use mmu notifiers (x86)

Need reverse mapping to convert guest physical addresses to shadow/tlb 
addresses.  Not difficult to implement but requires careful locking.

- s390 (s390)

You can s390 your problems away if you have s390 hardware.

Can you explain your concerns?

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-07-08  8:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-07 14:17 [PATCH 00/23] Add KVM support for PPC64 (970) hosts Alexander Graf
2009-07-07 15:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-07-07 15:49 ` Alexander Graf
2009-07-07 15:54 ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-07 15:56 ` Alexander Graf
2009-07-07 16:08 ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-08  6:17 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-08  6:22 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-08  6:42 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-08  7:35 ` Alexander Graf
2009-07-08  8:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-08  8:06 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2009-07-08  8:19 ` [PATCH 00/23] Add KVM support for PPC64 (970) host Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-08  8:28 ` [PATCH 00/23] Add KVM support for PPC64 (970) hosts Alexander Graf
2009-07-08  8:43 ` [PATCH 00/23] Add KVM support for PPC64 (970) host Avi Kivity
2009-07-08  9:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-08 10:04 ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-08 10:24 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-08 11:10 ` [PATCH 00/23] Add KVM support for PPC64 (970) hosts Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-08 12:29 ` Alexander Graf
2009-07-08 21:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-22 22:58 ` Olof Johansson
2009-07-22 23:02 ` Olof Johansson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A545396.4020404@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox