From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 13:13:24 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions
Message-Id: <4C29F174.9020902@redhat.com>
List-Id: <kvm-ppc.vger.kernel.org>
References: <1277507817-626-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <1277507817-626-2-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <4C285D1C.5060508@redhat.com> <20417D40-9345-485B-9201-8B3722B7457F@suse.de> <4C286770.6010204@redhat.com> <4C29ED94.6060904@suse.de> <4C29EF8A.4070508@redhat.com> <4C29EFCC.3030303@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <4C29EFCC.3030303@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>

On 06/29/2010 04:06 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> Are we looking at the same link? Looks good to me there.
>
>    


We're probably looking at the same link but looking at different 
things.  I'm whining about

     static u64 f() {
         ...
     }

as opposed to the more sober

     static u64 f()
     {
         ...
     }

for f in [kvmppc_mmu_hash_pte, kvmppc_mmu_hash_vpte, 
kvmppc_mmu_hash_vpte_long].

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function