From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 08:40:30 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Faster MMU lookups for Book3s v3 Message-Id: <4C2C547E.7010404@redhat.com> List-Id: References: <1277903926-12786-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <4C2C43C0.4000400@redhat.com> <7F9C2F52-3E95-4A22-B973-DACEBC95E5F4@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <7F9C2F52-3E95-4A22-B973-DACEBC95E5F4-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Alexander Graf Cc: kvm-ppc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, KVM list , linuxppc-dev On 07/01/2010 11:18 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: > > How does dirty bitmap flushing work on x86 atm? I loop through all mapped pages and flush the ones that match the range of the region I need to flush. But wouldn't it be a lot more efficient to have an hlist in the memslot and loop through that when I need to flush that memslot? > x86 loops through the reverse-map link list rooted at the memory slot. The linked list links all sptes for a single hva. So, it's like you describe, except it's an array of lists instead of a single list. We need per-page rmap lists to be able to remove a page's sptes in response to an mmu notifier callback, and to be able to write protect a guest page if it's used as a page table. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function