From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 19:50:29 +0000
Subject: Re: New git workflow
Message-Id: <4F85E085.7070705@freescale.com>
List-Id: <kvm-ppc.vger.kernel.org>
References: <4F7DD034.5090102@redhat.com> <4F81778C.4050202@redhat.com> <20120411122322.GB5007@bloggs.ozlabs.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120411122322.GB5007@bloggs.ozlabs.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, kvm-ppc <kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, Carsten Otte <carsteno@de.ibm.com>, "Roedel, Joerg" <Joerg.Roedel@amd.com>

On 04/11/2012 07:23 AM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 02:33:32PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 04/05/2012 08:02 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> I'll publish the new branches tomorrow, with any luck.
>>
>> There wasn't any luck, so it's only ready today.  To allow chance for
>> review, I'm publishing next as next-candidate.
>>
>> Paul/Alex, please review the powerpc bits.  Specifically:
>>
>>    system.h is gone, so I moved the prototype of load_up_fpu() to
>> <asm/switch_to.h>  and added a #include (8fae845f4956d).
>>    E6500 was added in upstream in parallel with the split of kvm
>> E500/E500MC.  I guessed which part of the #ifdef E6500 was to go into,
>> but please verify (73196cd364a2, 06aae86799c1b).
>
> All looks OK as far as I can see, but I have asked Scott Wood to
> double-check the e500/e500mc bits.

e6500 should have CPU_FTR_EMB_HV.  Otherwise looks OK.

-Scott