From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@freescale.com>,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 8/8] PPC: Don't use hardcoded opcode for ePAPR hcall invocation
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:16:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FF1D75D.4050507@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <440F1FF6-267A-452C-9665-274F684A1C93@suse.de>
On 07/02/2012 12:13 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 02.07.2012, at 19:10, Scott Wood wrote:
>
>> On 07/02/2012 07:30 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
>>> On 22.06.2012, at 22:06, Stuart Yoder wrote:
>>>
>>>> From: Liu Yu-B13201 <Yu.Liu@freescale.com>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Liu Yu <yu.liu@freescale.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@freescale.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> -v11: no changes
>>>>
>>>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/epapr_hcalls.h | 22 +++++++++---------
>>>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/fsl_hcalls.h | 36 +++++++++++++++---------------
>>>> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/epapr_hcalls.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/epapr_hcalls.h
>>>> index 833ce2c..b8d9445 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/epapr_hcalls.h
>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/epapr_hcalls.h
>>>> @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ static inline unsigned int ev_int_set_config(unsigned int interrupt,
>>>> r5 = priority;
>>>> r6 = destination;
>>>>
>>>> - __asm__ __volatile__ ("sc 1"
>>>> + asm volatile("bl epapr_hypercall_start"
>>>> : "+r" (r11), "+r" (r3), "+r" (r4), "+r" (r5), "+r" (r6)
>>>> : : EV_HCALL_CLOBBERS4
>>>
>>> Hrm. ePAPR hypercalls are allowed to clobber lr, right? But our hypercall entry code depends on lr staying alive:
>>
>> ePAPR 1.1 says LR is nonvolatile.
>
> Why is it in the clobber list then?
Because the inline assembly code is clobbering it -- not the hv-provided
hcall instructions.
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-02 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-22 20:06 [PATCH v11 8/8] PPC: Don't use hardcoded opcode for ePAPR hcall invocation Stuart Yoder
2012-07-02 12:30 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-02 17:10 ` Scott Wood
2012-07-02 17:13 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-02 17:16 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2012-07-02 17:17 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-02 17:25 ` Scott Wood
2012-07-02 17:34 ` Timur Tabi
2012-07-02 17:43 ` Scott Wood
2012-07-02 17:53 ` Timur Tabi
2012-07-02 17:57 ` Scott Wood
2012-07-02 18:02 ` Timur Tabi
2012-07-03 15:22 ` Yoder Stuart-B08248
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FF1D75D.4050507@freescale.com \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stuart.yoder@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox