Kernel KVM-PPC virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>,
	Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Handle memory slot deletion and modification correctly
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 09:39:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5030B43E.5090206@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120817183939.GA26687@amt.cnet>

On 08/17/2012 09:39 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> 
> Yes. Well, Avi mentioned earlier that there are users for change of GPA
> base. But, if my understanding is correct, the code that emulates
> change of BAR in QEMU is:
> 
>         /* now do the real mapping */
>         if (r->addr != PCI_BAR_UNMAPPED) {
>             memory_region_del_subregion(r->address_space, r->memory);
>         }
>         r->addr = new_addr;
>         if (r->addr != PCI_BAR_UNMAPPED) {
>             memory_region_add_subregion_overlap(r->address_space,
>                                                 r->addr, r->memory, 1);
> 
> These translate to two kvm_set_user_memory ioctls. 

Not directly.  These functions change a qemu-internal memory map, which
is then transferred to kvm.  Those two calls might be in a transaction
(they aren't now), in which case the memory map update is atomic.

So indeed we issue two ioctls now, but that's a side effect of the
implementation, not related to those two calls being separate.

> 
> "> Without taking into consideration backwards compatibility, userspace 
>  > can first delete the slot and later create a new one.
> 
>  Current qemu will in fact do that.  Not sure about older ones.
> "
> 
> Avi, where it does that?

By "that" I meant first deleting the first slot and then creating a new one.


-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-08-19  9:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-06 10:02 [PATCH 0/5] Improve memory slot handling and other fixes Paul Mackerras
2012-08-06 10:03 ` [PATCH 1/5] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Fix incorrect branch in H_CEDE code Paul Mackerras
2012-08-06 10:04 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: PPC: Quieten message about allocating linear regions Paul Mackerras
2012-08-06 10:06 ` [PATCH 3/5] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Handle memory slot deletion and modification correctly Paul Mackerras
2012-08-09 18:16   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-08-10  0:34     ` Paul Mackerras
2012-08-10  1:25       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-08-10  1:33         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-08-10  2:09         ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-08-10 18:35           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-08-11  0:37             ` Paul Mackerras
2012-08-13 16:34               ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-08-13 22:04                 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-08-15  9:26                   ` Avi Kivity
2012-08-15 17:59                     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-08-17  7:06                       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-08-17 18:39                         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-08-17 20:32                           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-08-23 13:55                             ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-08-24  9:29                               ` Paul Mackerras
2012-08-24 18:58                                 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-08-19  9:39                           ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2012-08-15  6:06                 ` Paul Mackerras
2012-08-15  9:23                 ` Avi Kivity
2012-08-06 10:06 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Take the SRCU read lock before looking up memslots Paul Mackerras
2012-08-09 18:22   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-08-10  0:45     ` Paul Mackerras
2012-08-06 10:08 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] KVM: PPC: Take the SRCU lock around memslot use Paul Mackerras
2012-08-09 18:27   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-08-10  0:37     ` Paul Mackerras
2012-08-10  9:27       ` Alexander Graf
2012-08-15  8:16         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-08-10  9:23 ` [PATCH 0/5] Improve memory slot handling and other fixes Alexander Graf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5030B43E.5090206@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox