From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 11:41:48 +0000 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11 Allow PR and HV KVM to coexist in one kernel Message-Id: <524AB4FC.10705@redhat.com> List-Id: References: <1380276233-17095-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <878uyibkq2.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <48337EF0-471D-4BDB-8088-FC072FF82753@suse.de> <87had2bgme.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <524990A9.60704@suse.de> <87ob79cjvm.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <524AB3AE.5000503@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <524AB3AE.5000503@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Alexander Graf Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, " list" , Gleb Natapov , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= Il 01/10/2013 13:36, Alexander Graf ha scritto: >>>> >>> Yes, so we should verify in the machine models that we're runnable with >>> the currently selected type at least, to give the user a sensible error >>> message. >> Something like the below > > I like that one a lot. Andreas, Paolo, what do you think? Yes, it's fine. Paolo