From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mike Qiu <qiudayu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 06:57:48 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] powerpc/powernv: Support PCI error injection
Message-Id: <53A9216C.8050904@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
List-Id: <kvm-ppc.vger.kernel.org>
References: <1403489682-14841-1-git-send-email-gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <1403489682-14841-3-git-send-email-gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <53A91819.1010900@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1403591761.4587.161.camel@pasglop>
In-Reply-To: <1403591761.4587.161.camel@pasglop>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: aik@ozlabs.ru, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, agraf@suse.de

On 06/24/2014 02:36 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>> Is it reasonable to do error injection with "CONFIG_IOMMU_API" ?
>>
>> That means if use default config(CONFIG_IOMMU_API = n),  we can not do
>> error injection to pci devices?
> Well we can't pass them through either so ...
> In any case, this is not a priority. First we need to implement a solid
> error injection facility for the *host*. The guest one is really really

OK.

Is that mean *host* side error injection should base on 
"CONFIG_IOMMU_API" ? If it is just host side(no guest, no pass through), 
can't we do error inject?

Maybe I misunderstand :)

Thanks
Mike
> low on the list.
>
> Cheers,
> Ben.
>
>
>