From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: drjones@redhat.com, dgibson@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/5] powerpc: add test to check invalid instruction trap
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 09:51:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56EBCF85.3030707@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1458141183-27207-3-git-send-email-lvivier@redhat.com>
On 16.03.2016 16:13, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
> ---
> powerpc/Makefile.common | 5 ++++-
> powerpc/emulator.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> powerpc/unittests.cfg | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 powerpc/emulator.c
>
> diff --git a/powerpc/Makefile.common b/powerpc/Makefile.common
> index ab2caf6..257e3fb 100644
> --- a/powerpc/Makefile.common
> +++ b/powerpc/Makefile.common
> @@ -7,7 +7,8 @@
> tests-common = \
> $(TEST_DIR)/selftest.elf \
> $(TEST_DIR)/spapr_hcall.elf \
> - $(TEST_DIR)/rtas.elf
> + $(TEST_DIR)/rtas.elf \
> + $(TEST_DIR)/emulator.elf
>
> all: $(TEST_DIR)/boot_rom.bin test_cases
>
> @@ -70,3 +71,5 @@ $(TEST_DIR)/selftest.elf: $(cstart.o) $(reloc.o) $(TEST_DIR)/selftest.o
> $(TEST_DIR)/spapr_hcall.elf: $(cstart.o) $(reloc.o) $(TEST_DIR)/spapr_hcall.o
>
> $(TEST_DIR)/rtas.elf: $(cstart.o) $(reloc.o) $(TEST_DIR)/rtas.o
> +
> +$(TEST_DIR)/emulator.elf: $(cstart.o) $(reloc.o) $(TEST_DIR)/emulator.o
> diff --git a/powerpc/emulator.c b/powerpc/emulator.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..1215c4f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/powerpc/emulator.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
> +/*
> + * Test some powerpc instructions
> + */
> +
> +#include <libcflat.h>
> +#include <asm/processor.h>
> +
> +static int volatile is_invalid;
> +
> +static void program_check_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, void *opaque)
> +{
> + int *data = opaque;
> +
> + printf("Detected invalid instruction 0x%016lx: %08x\n",
> + regs->nip, *(uint32_t*)regs->nip);
Should the test always print this, or is this rather confusing for the
users? Then it should maybe be commented out by default, I think.
> + *data = 1;
> +
> + regs->nip += 4;
> +}
> +
> +static void test_illegal(void)
> +{
> + report_prefix_push("invalid");
> +
> + is_invalid = 0;
> +
> + asm volatile (".long 0");
> +
> + report("exception", is_invalid);
> +
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +}
> +
> +int main(void)
> +{
> + handle_exception(0x700, program_check_handler, (void *)&is_invalid);
> +
> + report_prefix_push("emulator");
> +
> + test_illegal();
> +
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +
> + return report_summary();
> +}
> diff --git a/powerpc/unittests.cfg b/powerpc/unittests.cfg
> index 02b21c7..ed4fdbe 100644
> --- a/powerpc/unittests.cfg
> +++ b/powerpc/unittests.cfg
> @@ -47,3 +47,6 @@ file = rtas.elf
> extra_params = -append "set-time-of-day"
> timeout = 5
> groups = rtas
> +
> +[emulator]
> +file = emulator.elf
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
BTW: I think you could optionally also check the contents of SRR1 for
sane values in test_illegal(), in case you want to improve the test a
little bit.
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-18 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-16 15:12 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/5] Check emulation Laurent Vivier
2016-03-16 15:12 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/5] powerpc: add exception handler Laurent Vivier
2016-03-18 3:59 ` David Gibson
2016-03-18 8:53 ` Laurent Vivier
2016-03-18 9:42 ` Thomas Huth
2016-03-16 15:13 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/5] powerpc: add test to check invalid instruction trap Laurent Vivier
2016-03-18 9:51 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2016-03-18 10:08 ` Laurent Vivier
2016-03-18 10:12 ` Thomas Huth
2016-03-16 15:13 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 3/5] powerpc: check 64bit mode Laurent Vivier
2016-03-18 8:28 ` Thomas Huth
2016-03-18 8:38 ` Paul Mackerras
2016-03-18 8:41 ` Thomas Huth
2016-03-16 15:13 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 4/5] powerpc: check lswx Laurent Vivier
2016-03-18 9:09 ` Thomas Huth
2016-03-18 10:01 ` Laurent Vivier
2016-03-18 10:06 ` Thomas Huth
2016-03-18 10:18 ` Laurent Vivier
2016-03-18 10:34 ` Thomas Huth
2016-03-16 15:13 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 5/5] powerpc: Check lswx in little-endian mode Laurent Vivier
2016-03-18 9:54 ` Thomas Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56EBCF85.3030707@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=dgibson@redhat.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox