From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, lvivier@redhat.com
Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, drjones@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] powerpc: Add emulator test for the lswi instruction
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 11:02:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <570F78AF.2060102@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460575886-12569-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com>
On 13.04.2016 21:31, Thomas Huth wrote:
> This test checks some special cases of the lswi instruction. Test
> works fine on real hardware, but in QEMU, this reveals a bug with
> the final "don't overwrite RA" test (RA gets destroyed since the
> check in QEMU is still wrong).
> The code is based on the lswx test by Laurent Vivier.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> ---
> powerpc/emulator.c | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+)
...
> + /* check wrap around doesn't break RA */
> + asm volatile ("mr r28,r1\n"
> + "mr r29,r2\n"
> + "li r31,-1\n"
> + "mr r2,r31\n"
Ugh, I just had to discover that overwriting r2 is a bad idea here: The
exception vector code in cstart64.S depends on r2 pointing to the GOT
(when doing the "LOAD_REG_ADDR(r0, call_handler)"), so when an
(expected) exception occurs during lswi, the handler crashes in an
endless loop :-/
So please ignore this patch, I'll send a new version.
> + "mr r0,r31\n"
> + "mr r1, %[addr]\n"
> + ".long 0x7fe184aa\n" /* lswi r31, r1, 16 */
> + "std r31, 0*8(%[regs])\n"
> + "std r0, 1*8(%[regs])\n"
> + "std r1, 2*8(%[regs])\n"
> + "std r2, 3*8(%[regs])\n"
> + "mr r1,r28\n"
> + "mr r2,r29\n"
> + ::
> + [addr] "r" (addr),
> + [regs] "r" (regs)
> + :
> + /* loading four registers from r31 wraps around to r2,
> + * r1 is saved to r29, as adding it to the clobber
> + * list doesn't protect it
> + */
> + "r31", "r0", "r28", "r29", "memory");
> +
> + /* doc says it is invalid, real proc stops when it comes to
> + * overwrite the register.
> + * In all the cases, the register must stay untouched
> + */
> + report("Don't overwrite RA", regs[2] = (uint64_t)addr);
> +
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +}
> +
> /*
> * lswx: Load String Word Indexed X-form
> *
> @@ -234,6 +361,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>
> test_64bit();
> test_illegal();
> + test_lswi();
> test_lswx();
>
> report_prefix_pop();
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-14 11:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-13 19:31 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] powerpc: Add emulator test for the lswi instruction Thomas Huth
2016-04-14 11:02 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=570F78AF.2060102@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox