From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Zyngier Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 07:42:35 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/21] KVM: Move x86's version of struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache to common code Message-Id: List-Id: References: <20200605213853.14959-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> <20200605213853.14959-15-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20200605213853.14959-15-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Sean Christopherson Cc: Paul Mackerras , Christian Borntraeger , Janosch Frank , Paolo Bonzini , James Morse , Julien Thierry , Suzuki K Poulose , David Hildenbrand , Cornelia Huck , Claudio Imbrenda , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Feiner , Peter Shier , Junaid Shahid , Ben Gardon , Christoffer Dall Hi Sean, On 2020-06-05 22:38, Sean Christopherson wrote: > Move x86's 'struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache' to common code in anticipation > of moving the entire x86 implementation code to common KVM and reusing > it for arm64 and MIPS. Add a new architecture specific asm/kvm_types.h > to control the existence and parameters of the struct. The new header > is needed to avoid a chicken-and-egg problem with asm/kvm_host.h as all > architectures define instances of the struct in their vCPU structs. > > Suggested-by: Christoffer Dall > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson > --- > arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_types.h | 6 ++++++ > arch/mips/include/asm/kvm_types.h | 5 +++++ > arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_types.h | 5 +++++ > arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_types.h | 5 +++++ > arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 13 ------------- > arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_types.h | 7 +++++++ > include/linux/kvm_types.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ > 7 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_types.h > create mode 100644 arch/mips/include/asm/kvm_types.h > create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_types.h > create mode 100644 arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_types.h > create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_types.h > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_types.h > b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_types.h > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..d0987007d581 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_types.h > @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ > +#ifndef _ASM_ARM64_KVM_TYPES_H > +#define _ASM_ARM64_KVM_TYPES_H > + > +#endif /* _ASM_ARM64_KVM_TYPES_H */ > + > diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/kvm_types.h > b/arch/mips/include/asm/kvm_types.h > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..5efeb32a5926 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/kvm_types.h > @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ > +#ifndef _ASM_MIPS_KVM_TYPES_H > +#define _ASM_MIPS_KVM_TYPES_H > + > +#endif /* _ASM_MIPS_KVM_TYPES_H */ > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_types.h > b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_types.h > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..f627eceaa314 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_types.h > @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ > +#ifndef _ASM_POWERPC_KVM_TYPES_H > +#define _ASM_POWERPC_KVM_TYPES_H > + > +#endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_KVM_TYPES_H */ > diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_types.h > b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_types.h > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..b66a81f8a354 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_types.h > @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ > +#ifndef _ASM_S390_KVM_TYPES_H > +#define _ASM_S390_KVM_TYPES_H > + > +#endif /* _ASM_S390_KVM_TYPES_H */ Instead of carrying an empty include file for at least two of the architectures (s390 and Power), how about having it in asm-generic, and updating arch/$ARCH/include/asm/Kbuild to point to the generic one? Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...