[PATCH V2 5/6] riscv: Test for specific SBI implementation ID

[Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>]

On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 09:46:23AM +0100, cem at kernel.org wrote:
> From: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
> 
> Retrieve the ID from the SBI, and test it against the SBI_IMPLID
> enviroment variable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
> ---
> V2:
> 	- Update commit description to fit 70 chars
> 	- Move sbi_ecall() after expected assignment to make consistent with
> 	  other tests
> 
>  riscv/sbi.c | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/riscv/sbi.c b/riscv/sbi.c
> index bc0f5c68..65492fd6 100644
> --- a/riscv/sbi.c
> +++ b/riscv/sbi.c
> @@ -51,6 +51,15 @@ static void check_base(void)
>  	}
>  	report_prefix_pop();
>  
> +	report_prefix_push("sbi_impl_id");
> +	if (env_or_skip("SBI_IMPLID")) {

Let's spell this SBI_IMPL_ID (just like its report prefix)

> +		expected = strtol(getenv("SBI_IMPLID"), NULL, 0);
> +		ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_BASE, SBI_EXT_BASE_GET_IMP_ID,
> +				SBI_EXT_BASE, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);

This should be

  sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_BASE, SBI_EXT_BASE_GET_IMP_ID, 0, ...)

> +		gen_report(&ret, 0, expected);
> +	}
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +
>  	report_prefix_push("probe_ext");
>  	expected = getenv("PROBE_EXT") ? strtol(getenv("PROBE_EXT"), NULL, 0) : 1;
>  	ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_BASE, SBI_EXT_BASE_PROBE_EXT, SBI_EXT_BASE, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
> -- 
> 2.44.0
>

Thanks,
drew