From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Jones Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:40:10 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 0/5] riscv: Apply Zawrs when available Message-ID: <20240315134009.580167-7-ajones@ventanamicro.com> List-Id: To: kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Zawrs provides two instructions (wrs.nto and wrs.sto), where both are meant to allow the hart to enter a low-power state while waiting on a store to a memory location. The instructions also both wait an implementation-defined "short" duration (unless the implementation terminates the stall for another reason). The difference is that while wrs.sto will terminate when the duration elapses, wrs.nto, depending on configuration, will either just keep waiting or an ILL exception will be raised. Like wfi (and with the same {m,h}status bits to configure it), when wrs.nto is configured to raise exceptions it's expected that the higher privilege level will see the instruction was a wait instruction, do something, and then resume execution following the instruction. Currently, it's not expected that M-mode will configure and handle exceptions for timeouts (so it's expected that mstatus.TW=0), but KVM does configure exceptions for wfi (hstatus.VTW=1) and therefore also for wrs.nto. KVM does this for wfi since it's better to allow other tasks to be scheduled while a VCPU waits for an interrupt. For waits such as those where wrs.nto/sto would be used, which are typically locks, it is also a good idea for KVM to be involved, as it can attempt to schedule the lock holding VCPU. This series starts with Christoph's addition of riscv smp_cond_load* functions which apply wrs.sto when available. We then switch from wrs.sto to wrs.nto, add hwprobe support (since the instructions are also usable from usermode), and finally teach KVM about wrs.nto, allowing guests to see and use the Zawrs extension. We still don't have test results from hardware, and it's not possible to prove that using Zawrs is a win when testing on QEMU, not even when oversubscribing VCPUs to guests. However, it is possible to use KVM selftests to force a scenario where we can prove Zawrs does its job and does it well. [4] is a test which does this and, on my machine, without Zawrs it takes 16 seconds to complete and with Zawrs it takes 0.25 seconds. This series is based on kvm/queue and also available here [1]. In order to use QEMU for testing a build with [2] is needed. In order to enable guests to use Zawrs with KVM using kvmtool, the branch at [3] may be used. [1] https://github.com/jones-drew/linux/commits/riscv/zawrs-v1/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240312152901.512001-2-ajones at ventanamicro.com/ [3] https://github.com/jones-drew/kvmtool/commits/riscv/zawrs/ [4] https://github.com/jones-drew/linux/commit/2e712b19b7bb78634199bf262e6a75e09e1c87d2 Thanks, drew Andrew Jones (4): riscv: Prefer wrs.nto over wrs.sto riscv: hwprobe: export Zawrs ISA extension KVM: riscv: Support guest wrs.nto KVM: riscv: selftests: Add Zawrs extension to get-reg-list test Christoph M?llner (1): riscv: Add Zawrs support for spinlocks Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst | 4 + arch/riscv/Kconfig | 13 +++ arch/riscv/include/asm/barrier.h | 87 +++++++++++++++++++ arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h | 1 + arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 + arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h | 1 + arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 1 + arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 1 + arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c | 1 + arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c | 1 + arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_insn.c | 15 ++++ arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c | 2 + .../selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c | 4 + 13 files changed, 132 insertions(+) -- 2.44.0