From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Conor Dooley Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 10:41:14 -0000 Subject: [PATCH v2 2/7] RISC-V: Detect AIA CSRs from ISA string In-Reply-To: References: <20230128072737.2995881-3-apatel@ventanamicro.com> Message-ID: List-Id: To: kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hey Christoph, On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 08:12:58AM +0100, Christoph M?llner wrote: > Hi all, > > The RISC-V Architectural Review Committee has discussed the concerns > regarding the non-ratified chapters in the AIA specification. Thanks for the update! > Here is the relevant quote from the meeting minutes: > """ > Although the Advanced Interrupt Architecture (AIA) has already passed > Architecture Review (with a minor edit still pending), the committee > has some suggestions about its final steps to ratification, to avoid > the AIA document having a mixture of ratified and non-ratified content: > - The AIA document's remaining draft chapter on the Duo-PLIC, which is > not currently on a path to ratification, can be removed to a separate > document. That sounds promising... > - Ratification of the full AIA (without Duo-PLIC) can be postponed to > coincide with ratification of the IOMMU specification, given that > the latter is now expected in a reasonable time, and the AIA's last > chapter concerning IOMMUs is already scheduled to go through public > review and be ratified only together with the IOMMU specification. > """ ...and so does this. AIA stuff's acceptability only depending on the IOMMU spec's freeze (and thus Chapter 9's) seems like a vast improvement on the status quo to me! > The full meeting minutes can be found here: > https://lists.riscv.org/g/tech-chairs/message/1381 This link is non functional unfortunately :/ Cheers, Conor. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 228 bytes Desc: not available URL: