From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 20:31:46 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] RISC-V: Factor out body of riscv_init_cbom_blocksize
 loop
In-Reply-To: <20221027130247.31634-2-ajones@ventanamicro.com>
References: <20221027130247.31634-1-ajones@ventanamicro.com>
 <20221027130247.31634-2-ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Message-ID: <Y17fMkRRkTIbEX+r@spud>
List-Id: <kvm-riscv.lists.infradead.org>
To: kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 03:02:39PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> Refactor riscv_init_cbom_blocksize() to prepare for it to be used
> for both cbom block size and cboz block size.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c b/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c
> index 57b40a350420..f096b9966cae 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c
> @@ -91,34 +91,39 @@ void flush_icache_pte(pte_t pte)
>  unsigned int riscv_cbom_block_size;
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(riscv_cbom_block_size);
>  
> +static void cbo_get_block_size(struct device_node *node,
> +			       const char *name, u32 *blksz,

Is there a reason you called this "blksz" when we are using the spelt
out "block_size" everywhere else in this code? My OCD would appreciate
the consistency :s

Other than that:
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

> +			       unsigned long *first_hartid)
> +{
> +	unsigned long hartid;
> +	u32 val;
> +
> +	if (riscv_of_processor_hartid(node, &hartid))
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (of_property_read_u32(node, name, &val))
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (!*blksz) {
> +		*blksz = val;
> +		*first_hartid = hartid;
> +	} else if (*blksz != val) {
> +		pr_warn("%s mismatched between harts %lu and %lu\n",
> +			name, *first_hartid, hartid);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void)
>  {
>  	struct device_node *node;
>  	unsigned long cbom_hartid;
> -	u32 val, probed_block_size;
> -	int ret;
> +	u32 probed_block_size;
>  
>  	probed_block_size = 0;
>  	for_each_of_cpu_node(node) {
> -		unsigned long hartid;
> -
> -		ret = riscv_of_processor_hartid(node, &hartid);
> -		if (ret)
> -			continue;
> -
>  		/* set block-size for cbom extension if available */
> -		ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "riscv,cbom-block-size", &val);
> -		if (ret)
> -			continue;
> -
> -		if (!probed_block_size) {
> -			probed_block_size = val;
> -			cbom_hartid = hartid;
> -		} else {
> -			if (probed_block_size != val)
> -				pr_warn("cbom-block-size mismatched between harts %lu and %lu\n",
> -					cbom_hartid, hartid);
> -		}
> +		cbo_get_block_size(node, "riscv,cbom-block-size",
> +				   &probed_block_size, &cbom_hartid);
>  	}
>  
>  	if (probed_block_size)
> -- 
> 2.37.3
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv