From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 08:14:13 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 22/44] KVM: RISC-V: Do arch init directly in
 riscv_kvm_init()
In-Reply-To: <20221102231911.3107438-23-seanjc@google.com>
References: <20221102231911.3107438-1-seanjc@google.com>
 <20221102231911.3107438-23-seanjc@google.com>
Message-ID: <cb935198-e2f3-bc9e-a13c-2fa2bf8ea46b@linaro.org>
List-Id: <kvm-riscv.lists.infradead.org>
To: kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 3/11/22 00:18, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Fold the guts of kvm_arch_init() into riscv_kvm_init() instead of
> bouncing through kvm_init()=>kvm_arch_init().  Functionally, this is a
> glorified nop as invoking kvm_arch_init() is the very first action
> performed by kvm_init().
> 
> Moving setup to riscv_kvm_init(), which is tagged __init, will allow
> tagging more functions and data with __init and __ro_after_init.  And
> emptying kvm_arch_init() will allow dropping the hook entirely once all
> architecture implementations are nops.
> 
> No functional change intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> ---
>   arch/riscv/kvm/main.c | 18 +++++++++---------
>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daud? <philmd@linaro.org>