From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Subject: XP Guest Clock Slow Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:14:51 -0600 Message-ID: <003901c977f5$8ff60e10$afe22a30$@net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Return-path: Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:37598 "EHLO out1.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754228AbZAPQPE (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:15:04 -0500 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E85CA22F30A for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:15:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from compaq (pool-71-170-93-16.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [71.170.93.16]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6976C39609 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:15:01 -0500 (EST) Content-Language: en-us Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello, I just upgraded my hardware to a VT-capable CPU, and am getting up-to-speed with kvm. The clock on my XP guest significantly lags (e.g. by 50%) behind the host. I lose several hours overnight in the guest clock. (Not just a few seconds) System load seems to aggravate the problem. I have seen similar behavior in quick tests on a Vista client. My Ubuntu client is fine, presumably due to clocksource==kvm-clock in guest. Everything else works fine in all guest VMs. (Amazingly well, actually) Performance is equal to or better what I have been used to with VMware Server. Host CPU is Athlon 64 X2 with SB700 chipset. System dumps (lspci, cpuinfo, etc) available on request (I don't want to flood) Host environment is Debian Lenny, with the distribution 2.6.26 kernel. Currently running a locally compiled/installed kvm-82 I also saw the same issue with the kvm-72 Debian package. My host clock is set to 'hpet' | /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0$ cat * | hpet acpi_pm jiffies tsc | hpet Is there a paravirtual clock driver for M$ clients available? What is current best practice to work around this problem? Thanks, -- Marty