From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Fedin Subject: RE: [RFC] Handling CP15 timer without in-kernel irqchip Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 12:41:38 +0300 Message-ID: <00c401d0fcf6$8aa1ac70$9fe50550$@samsung.com> References: <00a001d0fce3$f76e2170$e64a6450$@samsung.com> <560E4EC4.5050101@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: marc.zyngier@arm.com, 'Christoffer Dall' To: 'Paolo Bonzini' , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mailout3.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.13]:64856 "EHLO mailout3.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752075AbbJBJln (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Oct 2015 05:41:43 -0400 Received: from eucpsbgm1.samsung.com (unknown [203.254.199.244]) by mailout3.w1.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.31.0 64bit (built May 5 2014)) with ESMTP id <0NVL00D956XHX690@mailout3.w1.samsung.com> for kvm@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 10:41:41 +0100 (BST) In-reply-to: <560E4EC4.5050101@redhat.com> Content-language: ru Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello! > I like the latter. But I guess one could even do both? You know, you are right, they absolutely do not contradict each other. Patch set for #1 is quite not big, if you are interested, and nobody votes strongly against, i can rebase it to 4.3 and post. Kind regards, Pavel Fedin Expert Engineer Samsung Electronics Research center Russia