From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pavel Fedin
Subject: RE: [RFC] Handling CP15 timer without in-kernel irqchip
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 12:41:38 +0300
Message-ID: <00c401d0fcf6$8aa1ac70$9fe50550$@samsung.com>
References: <00a001d0fce3$f76e2170$e64a6450$@samsung.com>
<560E4EC4.5050101@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: marc.zyngier@arm.com,
'Christoffer Dall'
To: 'Paolo Bonzini' ,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Return-path:
Received: from mailout3.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.13]:64856 "EHLO
mailout3.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
with ESMTP id S1752075AbbJBJln (ORCPT );
Fri, 2 Oct 2015 05:41:43 -0400
Received: from eucpsbgm1.samsung.com (unknown [203.254.199.244])
by mailout3.w1.samsung.com
(Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.31.0 64bit (built May 5 2014))
with ESMTP id <0NVL00D956XHX690@mailout3.w1.samsung.com> for
kvm@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 10:41:41 +0100 (BST)
In-reply-to: <560E4EC4.5050101@redhat.com>
Content-language: ru
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID:
Hello!
> I like the latter. But I guess one could even do both?
You know, you are right, they absolutely do not contradict each other.
Patch set for #1 is quite not big, if you are interested, and nobody votes strongly against, i can
rebase it to 4.3 and post.
Kind regards,
Pavel Fedin
Expert Engineer
Samsung Electronics Research center Russia