From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Fedin Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 0/3] KVM: arm/arm64: Allow to use KVM without in-kernel irqchip Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 11:36:46 +0300 Message-ID: <00d101d0c847$6039ac50$20ad04f0$@samsung.com> References: <55A93488.9060408@arm.com> <00df01d0c22b$fcaef0d0$f60cd270$@samsung.com> <55ACAC73.9090500@arm.com> <03d901d0c44e$beadaa90$3c08ffb0$@samsung.com> <55B11AEC.4050804@arm.com> <008f01d0c625$45d91a90$d18b4fb0$@samsung.com> <55B26277.80205@arm.com> <007901d0c7a1$99981f50$ccc85df0$@samsung.com> <55B5DD88.5070203@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: 'Christoffer Dall' , 'Eric Auger' To: 'Marc Zyngier' , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mailout3.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.13]:42707 "EHLO mailout3.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751262AbbG0Igu (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jul 2015 04:36:50 -0400 Received: from eucpsbgm2.samsung.com (unknown [203.254.199.245]) by mailout3.w1.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.31.0 64bit (built May 5 2014)) with ESMTP id <0NS50039O19BXW50@mailout3.w1.samsung.com> for kvm@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 09:36:47 +0100 (BST) In-reply-to: <55B5DD88.5070203@arm.com> Content-language: ru Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello! > > And i agreed. So, i repeat the question. Will it be OK if we just > > enable KVM without both vGIC and vTimer, and that's all we do? It > > will be userland's problem how to handle them. I need to tweak my > > first patchset a very small bit in order to do this. > > I I'll repeat what I already said: "Show me the patches". > > I'll only give you an answer once I exactly know what you're up to. You have already seen them, it is the very same patchset we are discussing in this thread. Kind regards, Pavel Fedin Expert Engineer Samsung Electronics Research center Russia